Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Principles in bone physiology.

W S Jee1

  • 1Division of Radiobiology, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.

Journal of Musculoskeletal & Neuronal Interactions
|March 11, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Harold M. Frost. William. F. Neuman awardee 2001.

Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions·2005
Same author

Animal models of bone diseases. Introduction.

Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions·2005
Same author

Overview: animal models of osteopenia and osteoporosis.

Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions·2005
Same author

Long-term effects of aging and orchidectomy on bone and body composition in rapidly growing male rats.

Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions·2005
Same author

A novel method to 'exercise' rats: making rats rise to erect bipedal stance for feeding - raised cage model.

Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions·2005
Same author

Anabolic agents and osteoporosis: quo vadis?

Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions·2005
Same journal

Commentary to: Relationship Between Plantar Pressure, Body Mass Index and Balance in Children: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions·2026
Same journal

Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head Following Posterior Hip Dislocation in an Adolescent.

Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions·2026
Same journal

Astragalus Polysaccharides Attenuate LPS-Induced Degenerative Responses in Primary Rat Chondrocytes linked to the NLRP3/CASPASE-1 Axis.

Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions·2026
Same journal

Quantitative Analysis of Spontaneous Tongue Muscle Reinnervation after Long Nerve Resection for Hypoglossal Nerve Injury in Rats.

Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions·2026
Same journal

Expression of miR-27a in Patients with Steroid-associated Femoral Head Osteonecrosis and Its Regulatory Mechanism on Proliferation and Osteogenic Differentiation of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions·2026
Same journal

Effect of Sensory- Motor Integration Training on Activities of Daily Living in Children with Erb's Palsy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions·2026
See all related articles

Mechanical factors, not non-mechanical agents, primarily control bone strength and mass. The Utah paradigm emphasizes biomechanics in skeletal physiology, updating previous views on bone health and remodeling.

Area of Science:

  • Skeletal Physiology
  • Biomechanics
  • Bone Biology

Background:

  • The traditional view posits non-mechanical agents (hormones, nutrients, genetics) as primary drivers of osteoblast and osteoclast activity.
  • This paradigm fails to incorporate tissue-level features and biomechanical principles discovered post-1960.
  • The Utah paradigm, proposed by Harold Frost, offers an alternative framework for understanding skeletal physiology.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To challenge the obsolete view of non-mechanical agents dominating bone control.
  • To highlight the significance of mechanical factors in postnatal bone mass and strength regulation.
  • To present evidence supporting the Utah paradigm of skeletal physiology.

Main Methods:

  • Review and synthesis of scientific literature on skeletal physiology.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of the traditional paradigm with the Utah paradigm.
  • Analysis of evidence supporting the dominance of mechanical factors in bone remodeling.

    • Main Results:

    • Non-mechanical agents are secondary to mechanical factors in controlling bone strength and mass.
    • The Utah paradigm accurately reflects the dominance of biomechanics in regulating bone.
    • New evidence supports the Utah paradigm as a supplement to, rather than a replacement for, existing views.

    Conclusions:

    • Mechanical loading is the principal determinant of bone strength and mass.
    • The Utah paradigm provides a more comprehensive understanding of skeletal physiology.
    • Future research should integrate biomechanical principles into bone health studies.