Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Analytical approaches for transplant research, 2004.

Douglas E Schaubel1, Dawn M Dykstra, Susan Murray

  • 1Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. deschau@umich.edu

American Journal of Transplantation : Official Journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons
|March 12, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An Interactive Virtual Nephrologist to Engage Patients With Advanced CKD About Transplantation.

American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation·2026
Same author

Real-World Long-term Comparisons of Rituximab versus Calcineurin Inhibitors for Membranous Nephropathy in the Cure Glomerulonephropathy Study.

Kidney360·2026
Same author

Longitudinal Predictors of Dental Caries, Periodontal Disease and Oral Health Quality of Life in People with HIV on ART: The OHART study.

Research square·2026
Same author

Do Prolonged Donor Warm Ischemic Times Correlate with Kidney Transplant Outcomes? The Largest Study of Donation After Circulatory Death Donors in the United States.

Transplantation·2026
Same author

Real-world Impact of Treatment on Growth in Children With X-Linked Hypophosphatemia.

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism·2026
Same author

A Novel Measurement of Altered Achilles Subtendon Load Sharing 6-12 Months Following Rupture.

Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society·2026

The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) details its methods for analyzing transplant outcomes, including waiting times and allocation policies. Simulated allocation modeling (SAM) aids in developing new organ allocation strategies, like prioritizing liver candidates with high MELD scores.

Area of Science:

  • Transplantation science
  • Biostatistics
  • Health services research

Background:

  • The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) plays a crucial role in collecting and analyzing data on organ transplantation in the United States.
  • Accurate and transparent methodology is essential for reliable outcomes analysis and informed policy development in transplantation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a comprehensive overview of the analytical methods used by the SRTR for outcomes research.
  • To explain the methodologies behind transplant waiting time analyses and specialized organ allocation modeling.
  • To highlight the utility of Simulated Allocation Modeling (SAM) in evaluating and improving organ allocation policies.

Main Methods:

  • Detailed explanation of SRTR's analytical processes: cohort selection, follow-up, outcome definition, event ascertainment, censoring, and adjustments.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Description of descriptive analyses (e.g., mortality rates, survival probabilities) and regression modeling for covariate effects.
  • Introduction to specialized modeling strategies, including Simulated Allocation Modeling (SAM) for liver, thoracic, and kidney-pancreas systems.

    • Main Results:

    • SRTR methods enable robust analysis of transplant outcomes, including descriptive statistics and covariate effect estimation.
    • Specialized modeling, particularly SAM, offers a powerful tool for comparing policy impacts on organ allocation.
    • SAM has informed the implementation of new allocation policies, such as regional offers for high MELD liver candidates.

    Conclusions:

    • The SRTR employs rigorous statistical methods to analyze transplant outcomes and inform policy.
    • Simulated Allocation Modeling (SAM) is a valuable tool for evaluating and optimizing organ allocation systems.
    • These analytical advancements contribute to more equitable and effective organ distribution, improving patient outcomes.