Related Experiment Videos
Prevalence of inducible clindamycin resistance in macrolide-resistant Staphylococcus spp
1Sparta General Hospital, Microbiology, Sparta, Laconia, Greece. spifokas@yahoo.gr
Abstract:
Between January 2002 and December 2003, macrolide-resistant isolates of Staphylococcus aureus (n = 45) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS; n = 75) from a Greek hospital were examined phenotypically for inducible clindamycin resistance. The constitutive macrolide resistance phenotype predominated (60%) in S. aureus, followed by the inducible (35%) and the clindamycin-susceptible (5%) phenotypes. In CoNS, the inducible phenotype was more common than the constitutive phenotype (50% vs. 41%). There was a significant incidence of inducible clindamycin resistance, and screening of all staphylococci is necessary in order to differentiate inducibly resistant isolates from those that are truly sensitive.
Insights
Inducible clindamycin resistance is a significant concern in Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) in Greek hospitals. Routine screening is essential to identify these resistant strains and prevent treatment failures.
Area of Science:
- Medical Microbiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Antimicrobial Resistance
Background:
- Macrolide resistance is a growing problem in Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS).
- Inducible clindamycin resistance (ICR) can lead to treatment failures if not detected.
- Phenotypic characterization is crucial for understanding resistance mechanisms.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the prevalence of inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and CoNS isolates.
- To compare the frequency of inducible versus constitutive macrolide resistance phenotypes.
- To emphasize the need for routine screening for ICR in staphylococcal infections.
Main Methods:
- Phenotypic testing of macrolide-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (n=45) and CoNS (n=75) isolates.
- Isolates collected from a Greek hospital between January 2002 and December 2003.
- Assessment for inducible and constitutive clindamycin resistance patterns.
Main Results:
- In Staphylococcus aureus, constitutive macrolide resistance (60%) was most common, followed by inducible resistance (35%).
- In CoNS, the inducible resistance phenotype (50%) was more prevalent than the constitutive phenotype (41%).
- A significant incidence of inducible clindamycin resistance was observed in both bacterial groups.
Conclusions:
- Inducible clindamycin resistance is a significant finding in staphylococcal isolates from this Greek hospital.
- Screening all staphylococcal isolates is necessary to distinguish ICR from true susceptibility.
- Accurate identification of ICR is vital for appropriate antibiotic selection and patient management.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Development of Antibiotic Resistance
Staphylococcal Skin Infections