Related Experiment Videos
Evaluation of the school-based smoking-prevention program "BE smokeFREE"
Ola Jøsendal1, Leif Edvard Aarø, Torbjørn Torsheim
1Research Center for Health Promotion, University of Bergen, Norway.
Scandinavian Journal of Psychology
|March 15, 2005
Summary
The "BE smokeFREE" school program effectively reduced adolescent smoking. Comprehensive interventions significantly lowered weekly smoking rates compared to control groups.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Adolescent Health
- Health Behavior Interventions
Background:
- Adolescent smoking remains a significant public health concern.
- School-based programs are a key strategy for smoking prevention.
- The social influence model is a theoretical basis for effective interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of the school-based smoking prevention program "BE smokeFREE".
- To compare the effectiveness of different intervention intensities on adolescent smoking.
- To assess the long-term effects of a comprehensive social influence-based program.
Main Methods:
- A national representative sample of 99 schools and 4,441 students participated.
- Schools were randomized into a comparison group and three intervention groups (varying comprehensiveness).
- Data were collected at baseline and three follow-ups (1994-1997) using multilevel logistic regression.
Main Results:
- No baseline differences in smoking habits were observed between groups.
- The most comprehensive intervention (Group B) showed significantly more favorable changes in smoking habits.
- At the third follow-up, weekly smoking was 19.6% in the comprehensive group versus 29.2% in the comparison group.
- Less comprehensive interventions were less effective than the model intervention.
Conclusions:
- The comprehensive school-based "BE smokeFREE" intervention effectively reduced adolescent smoking rates.
- A social influence approach integrated into a comprehensive program is effective for smoking prevention.
- Intervention intensity, including teacher training and parental involvement, impacts program effectiveness.