Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Biomechanics in augmentation rhinoplasty.

J Yang1, X Wang, Y Zeng

  • 1Biomedical Engineering Center, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100022, PR China.

Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology
|March 15, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Silicone implants for rhinoplasty (nose reshaping surgery) are best placed under the periosteum, a tough tissue layer. This subperiosteal placement reduces complications compared to other depths, improving surgical outcomes for augmentation rhinoplasty.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Transfection of IFNalpha in human glioblastoma cells and tumorigenicity in association with induction of PKR and OAS gene expression.

Journal of neurosurgery·1996
Same author

In vitro transcriptional analysis of TyrR-mediated activation of the mtr and tyrP+3 promoters of Escherichia coli.

Journal of bacteriology·1996
Same author

Case report: ranitidine-induced bradycardia in a patient with dextrocardia.

The American journal of the medical sciences·1996
Same author

Antioxidant-sensitive regulation of inflammatory-response genes in Kaposi's sarcoma cells.

Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes and human retrovirology : official publication of the International Retrovirology Association·1996
Same author

Cytokine expression in the presence or absence of late airway responses after antigen challenge of sensitized rats.

American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology·1996
Same author

Injuries of the abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava in association with thoracolumbar fractures: a lethal combination.

The Journal of trauma·1996

Area of Science:

  • Plastic Surgery
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Anatomy

Background:

  • Classical silicone augmentation rhinoplasty has a history of complications.
  • Complications are often linked to implant depth and surrounding tissue properties.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the optimal layer for silicone implant placement in augmentation rhinoplasty.
  • To evaluate the biomechanical properties of nasal periosteum and fascia.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of complications in 406 patients undergoing silicone augmentation rhinoplasty.
  • Biomechanical testing of human nasal periosteum and fascia (tensile strength, stress-strain, stress relaxation).
  • Clinical evaluation of 22 cases of subperiosteal augmentation rhinoplasty.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Periosteum exhibits greater tensile strength than fascia, despite lower failure strain.
  • Biomechanical analysis indicates periosteum is tougher and stiffer than fascia.
  • Subperiosteal augmentation rhinoplasty yielded satisfactory results in 22 cases.

Conclusions:

  • The periosteum is biomechanically superior for covering silicone implants in rhinoplasty.
  • Subperiosteal placement is recommended to enhance stability and reduce complications in augmentation rhinoplasty.