Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2026

Structure-Guided Design and Development of Novel Cyclophilin A Inhibitors and Ganoderiol-F Derivatives: An In-Silico Approach
Published on: June 23, 2026
Molecular simulation of ligand-binding with DNA: implications for 125I-labeled pharmaceutical design
Kai Chen1, S James Adelstein, Amin I Kassis
1Harvard Medical School, 200 Longwood Avenue, Armenise Building, D2-137, Boston, MA 02115-5729, USA.
Purpose:
By using computer-assisted molecular modeling software, to assess the effects of structural modification on the interaction of 125I-labeled iodoHoechst ligands and DNA and to design new analogs with specified distances between the Auger-electron-emitting 125I atom and the DNA central axis.
Materials And Methods:
The Lamarckian genetic algorithm (AutoDock 3.0) was used to model the interaction between DNA and m-iodo-p-methoxyHoechst (IMH), a ligand whose binding to the minor groove of DNA has been demonstrated (crystal structure) and which is available in the Protein Data Bank. m-Iodo-p-ethoxyHoechst (IEH), a radioligand we had previously synthesized and characterized, was then docked onto DNA, the IEH-DNA complex minimized, and the binding free energy and inhibition constant (Ki) estimated and compared with those for IMH-DNA. Using the protocol, several novel iodoHoechst analogs (IH-A and IH-B) were designed. Finally, Insight II was used to measure the distances between the iodine atom (e.g. 125I) of these Hoechst analogs and of 5-iodo-2'-deoxyuridine (IdUrd) and the central axis of the targeted DNA, and these values were correlated with the expected/measured DSB yield following 125I decay.
Results:
The docking of IMH and DNA leads to a ligand-DNA complex approximately 1 A RMSD (root mean square deviation) from the crystal-structure position, and the IEH-DNA complex also has a small RMSD (1.27 A). The distances between the 125I atom and the DNA central axis are estimated as 8.61 A for IMH, 9.20 A for IEH and 5.7A for IdUrd. For the newly designed analogs, the distances from the 125I atom to the central DNA axis are 10.92 A for IH-A and 16.39 A for IH-B.
Conclusion:
These software programs can predict the reactivity of newly designed radiolabelled molecules with their targeted DNA molecules by molecular modeling prior to their chemical synthesis.
More Related Videos
09:15Measuring Biomolecular DSC Profiles with Thermolabile Ligands to Rapidly Characterize Folding and Binding Interactions
Published on: November 21, 2017
10:16Autoradiography as a Simple and Powerful Method for Visualization and Characterization of Pharmacological Targets
Published on: March 12, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Labeling DNA Probes
Radioisotopes, fluorophores, or small molecule binding partners like biotin or digoxigenin, are the most widely used reporter tags for labeling DNA probes. These labels can be attached to the probe DNA molecule via...
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength
Ligand Binding and Linkage
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally analyses the...