Influenza-like illness criteria were poorly related to laboratory-confirmed influenza in a sentinel surveillance

José María Navarro-Marí1, Mercedes Pérez-Ruiz, Purificación Cantudo-Muñoz

  • 1Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain. josem.navarro.sspa@juntadeandalucia.es

Abstract

Insights

Influenza-like illness criteria are not reliable for detecting influenza. A broader definition of acute respiratory infection may improve surveillance for early influenza virus detection.

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Public Health Surveillance

Background:

  • Influenza surveillance relies on accurate clinical case definitions.
  • Influenza-like illness (ILI) criteria are commonly used but their utility requires evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze clinical data related to influenza.
  • To assess the effectiveness of influenza-like illness criteria in sentinel surveillance.

Main Methods:

  • Outpatients with acute respiratory infection provided throat specimens and data.
  • Laboratory-confirmed influenza cases were compared against symptoms and ILI criteria.

Main Results:

  • 18.56% of patients tested positive for influenza.
  • Only 55.4% of confirmed influenza cases met ILI criteria (PPV 0.36, NPV 0.88).
  • Fever and cough showed moderate correlation with influenza, similar to ILI criteria.

Conclusions:

  • Influenza-like illness criteria show poor correlation with laboratory-confirmed influenza.
  • A less restrictive criterion, such as acute respiratory infection, may enhance early influenza detection in surveillance.