Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in different ways based on the...
Routes of Persuasion02:20

Routes of Persuasion

Persuasion is the process of changing our attitude toward something based on some kind of communication. Much of the persuasion we experience comes from outside forces. How do people convince others to change their attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors? What communications do you receive that attempt to persuade you to change your attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors?
Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes01:15

Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes

Cognitive processes affect social behavior by guiding how individuals perceive, interpret, and respond to social stimuli. These mental processes enable individuals to assess others' behaviors, attribute causes to their actions, and form expectations based on past experiences.Causes of Behavior and Social JudgmentsIndividuals determine the causes of others' behaviors by distinguishing between personal traits and external circumstances. For example, if a friend frequently arrives late, an...
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory01:29

Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus: Comparing...
Halo Effect01:27

Halo Effect

The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Influence of Weight Bias on Processes and Outcomes in Negotiation.

Psychological reports·2021
Same author

When Less Is More: How Complexity Impacts Goal Setting, Judgment Accuracy, and Deals in Negotiation.

Psychological reports·2020
Same author

The Push and Pull of Network Mobility: How Those High in Trait-Level Neuroticism Can Come to Occupy Peripheral Network Positions.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2019
Same author

Who gets credit for input? Demographic and structural status cues in voice recognition.

The Journal of applied psychology·2015
Same author

Debunking four myths about employee silence.

Harvard business review·2010
Same author

Playing favorites: the influence of leaders' inner circle on group processes and performance.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2009

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 20, 2026

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
11:51

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making

Published on: March 2, 2011

Negotiators' bargaining histories and their effects on future negotiation performance.

Kathleen M O'connor1, Josh A Arnold, Ethan R Burris

  • 1Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. kmo8@cornell.edu

The Journal of Applied Psychology
|March 17, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Previous negotiation outcomes significantly impact future deal quality. Past impasses lead to worse future deals, even with new partners, highlighting the importance of bargaining history.

More Related Videos

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
11:13

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test

Published on: November 19, 2015

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 20, 2026

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
11:51

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making

Published on: March 2, 2011

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
11:13

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test

Published on: November 19, 2015

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Economics
  • Social Psychology
  • Negotiation Research

Background:

  • Negotiation outcomes are often studied in isolation.
  • The influence of prior negotiation experiences on subsequent bargaining is not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how previous negotiation experiences affect the quality of subsequent deals.
  • To determine if past negotiation success or failure predicts future negotiation performance.

Main Methods:

  • Two studies were conducted involving negotiators.
  • Participants' prior negotiation outcomes (impasse vs. agreement) were compared to their subsequent negotiation performance.
  • The effect of changing negotiation partners was examined.

Main Results:

  • Negotiators experiencing a prior impasse were more likely to reach an impasse or a low-value deal in their next negotiation.
  • This effect persisted even when negotiators switched partners for the second negotiation.
  • Past bargaining performance strongly predicted future negotiation behavior.

Conclusions:

  • Bargaining histories are significant predictors of negotiation behavior.
  • Negotiations should be viewed as interconnected exchanges rather than isolated events.
  • Understanding past negotiation experiences is crucial for improving future deal-making.