Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Vortex shaped current sources in a physical torso phantom.

Mario Liehr1, Jens Haueisen, Matthias Goernig

  • 1Biomagnetic Center, Department of Neurology, University Hospital at the Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany. Mario.Liehr@uni-jena.de

Annals of Biomedical Engineering
|March 18, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Active vortex currents may explain differences between magnetocardiogram and electrocardiogram signals. Standard algorithms struggle to reconstruct these currents, necessitating improved source models for accurate analysis.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Charge based boundary element method with residual driven adaptive mesh refinement for high resolution electrical stimulation modeling.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Influence of frequency and pulse train duration on respiratory responses during transcutaneous phrenic nerve stimulation in humans.

Journal of neural engineering·2026
Same author

Erratum: Multivariate assessment of the central-cardiorespiratory network structure in neuropathological disease (2018<i>Physiol. Meas</i>.<b>39</b>074004).

Physiological measurement·2026
Same author

An ultra-sensitive multi-channel MEG system for the non-invasive single-trial detection of cortical population spikes.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Muscle anisotropy influences the phrenic nerve activation threshold in non-invasive electrical stimulation.

Medical & biological engineering & computing·2026
Same author

Characterization of a flexible cap for simultaneous OPM-MEG and EEG measurements.

Journal of neural engineering·2026

Area of Science:

  • Biophysics
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Cardiovascular Physiology

Background:

  • Discrepancies exist between human magnetocardiogram (MCG) and electrocardiogram (ECG) signals.
  • Active vortex currents are hypothesized as a potential cause for these signal differences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify the impact of active vortex currents on electric and magnetic signal strength.
  • To evaluate the efficacy of standard source localization algorithms in reconstructing vortex currents.

Main Methods:

  • Physical phantom experiments simulating a human torso.
  • Modeling active vortex currents using a circular array of twelve current dipoles.
  • Simultaneous recording of magnetic and electric data with stepwise dipole activation.
  • Assessment of source reconstruction accuracy using standard algorithms.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Magnetic signal strength increased continuously with the number of activated dipoles.
  • Electric signal strength peaked at a semicircle configuration and then decreased.
  • Unconstrained focal source models achieved high accuracy (<3mm error) for single dipoles only.
  • Minimum norm source reconstruction provided limited accuracy for complex dipole configurations.

Conclusions:

  • Active vortex currents likely contribute to the observed divergence between MCG and ECG data.
  • Current source localization algorithms are insufficient for accurately reconstructing complex vortex currents.
  • Development of advanced source models is crucial for precise vortex current analysis.