Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2026

Training Laboratory Rabbits to Refine Routine Husbandry Procedures
Published on: February 16, 2024
Misuse of anecdotes in primatology: lessons from citation analysis
Lauren A Sarringhaus1, William C McGrew, Linda F Marchant
1Department of Anthropology, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio 45056, USA.
Abstract:
This study analyzes the accuracy of anecdotes cited in behavioral primatology publications. Anecdotes (n=1 cases) recounting tool use were sought in the four main primatological journals. Citations of anecdotes in the scientific literature that met three criteria were systematically coded for recognition and accuracy. The results showed that 60% of the time, authors who cited anecdotes did not explicitly acknowledge them as such. To a lesser extent, the citations exaggerated the frequency of anecdotal events or misrepresented their status. For tool use specifically, the actor was misreported more often than the tool or its target. Multiple citations were incorrect more often than single citations. Overall, it seems that citation of anecdotes is problematic and may have far-reaching implications in terms of misleading overgeneralizations. Primatologists should take care in citing singular or rare events.
Related Concept Videos
Hindsight Biases
Fundamental Attribution Error
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One example of...
Naturalistic Observations
Evolutionary Psychology
Statistical Analysis: Overview
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...

