Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2026

Acetylcholine Re-Challenge After Intracoronary Nitroglycerine Administration
Published on: April 4, 2022
Therapeutic approach in patients with stable angina
Maddalena Lettino1, Colomba Falcone, Luigi Tavazzi
1Coronary Care Unit, IRCCS San Matteo Hospital, Pavia, Italy. m.lettino@smatteo.pv.it
Insights
Choosing between medical, interventional, or surgical treatment for chronic stable ischemic heart disease remains challenging. Current evidence is limited, with practice often guiding choices over established guidelines, especially for diabetic patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Public Health
Background:
- The optimal therapeutic strategy for chronic stable ischemic heart disease (CSIHD) among medical, interventional, and surgical options is a significant public health concern.
- Current scientific evidence offers limited guidance for selecting among medical treatment, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), leading to practice-based decision-making.
- The management of CSIHD, particularly in diabetic patients, presents unique challenges, with surgery traditionally recommended, though PCI outcomes are improving.
Purpose of the Study:
- To discuss existing findings and highlight current experiences in managing chronic stable ischemic heart disease.
- To emphasize the evolving landscape of therapeutic options, including pharmacological advancements and interventional procedures.
- To provide insights into the integrated approach for maximizing patient benefit in CSIHD.
Main Methods:
- Review and discussion of existing scientific evidence and clinical findings related to CSIHD management.
- Highlighting specific experiences and considerations for diabetic patients with CSIHD.
- Analysis of pharmacological therapies and coronary revascularization procedures.
Main Results:
- Evidence-based medicine is often superseded by practice-based medicine in choosing between medical, interventional, and surgical strategies for CSIHD.
- Percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes are significantly improving, even in complex patient groups like diabetics, challenging traditional surgical recommendations.
- Pharmacological therapies are advancing, with distinct drug categories for preventing mortality/myocardial infarction and for symptom/ischemia relief.
Conclusions:
- An integrated approach combining guideline-directed medical therapy with appropriate coronary revascularization is crucial for optimal outcomes in CSIHD.
- The choice of therapy requires careful consideration of individual patient factors, especially in diabetic populations where treatment paradigms are shifting.
- Continued research and evidence generation are needed to refine therapeutic strategies for chronic stable ischemic heart disease.
Abstract:
Which therapeutic strategy among medical, interventional and surgical options should be preferred in patients with chronic stable ischemic heart disease is an important public health problem. The available scientific evidence does not help much to facilitate the choice among the three available strategies of medical treatment, percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting. In this area practice-based medicine overwhelms evidence-based medicine. However, existing findings are discussed. The present experience in diabetic patients is highlighted; in such patients surgery is generally recommended but the results obtained by percutaneous coronary intervention with the currently available tools are improving markedly. Pharmacological therapy is also improving, particularly in the prevention of the progression of atherothrombosis and consequently of cardiovascular events. Actually two categories of drugs should be recognized: those prescribed to prevent death and myocardial infarction and those with antianginal and anti-ischemic effects aimed at alleviating symptoms and reducing ischemia. The first group of drugs includes antiplatelet-antithrombotic agents, lipid-lowering agents and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; the second group includes beta-blockers, calcium antagonists and nitrates. A good integration of the two classes of drugs, combined with an appropriate use of coronary revascularization procedures, should yield the maximum possible benefit in the individual patient.
Related Concept Videos
Angina IV: Management
Angina V: Nursing Management
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Angina II: Classification
Antianginal Drugs: Nitrates and β-Blockers
Organic nitrates, such as nitroglycerin, play a pivotal role. Once metabolized, they liberate nitric oxide, a molecular marvel. Nitric oxide triggers guanylyl cyclase and augments cGMP production. This biochemical cascade orchestrates the relaxation of vascular smooth muscles, ushering in vasodilation and enhancing coronary blood flow. Administered...
Angina III: Clinical Manifestations and Assessment

