Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Characterizing dye bias in microarray experiments.

K K Dobbin1, E S Kawasaki, D W Petersen

  • 1Biometric Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. dobbinke@mail.nih.gov

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)
|March 19, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Performance of a score to characterise adequate contact among the social network of persons with TB.

IJTLD open·2024
Same author

Nerve-Stretching in Infantile Paralysis.

British medical journal·2010
Same author

Remarks on Brassworkers' Diseases: Being a Thesis for the Degree of M.D. in the University of Cambridge.

British medical journal·2010
Same author

Cases of Influenza with Severe Abdominal Pain and Collapse.

British medical journal·2010
Same author

Perforation of Gastric Ulcer and its Treatment by Abdominal Section and Suture.

British medical journal·2010
Same author

Notes on the Use of Pilocarpin in Dermatology.

British medical journal·2010
Same journal

MCFST: Spatial domain identification method based on multi-view graph convolutional network and graph fusion network.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

SpaBiT: Enhancing Spatial Transcriptomics Resolution via Bidirectional Attention Transformers.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

EDEL: Enhancing Dense Retrievers for Curation of Biomedical Knowledge Bases.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Informative Relational Learning for Adverse Reaction Prediction with Enhanced Generalization to Novel Drugs.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

An interpretable deep learning framework uncovers features governing CRISPR-Cas9 genome-editing efficiency.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

3DICE: Interpretable 3D Cross-Modal Learning for Drug-Target Interaction Prediction and Large-Scale Drug Discovery.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
See all related articles

Consistent dye bias in gene expression microarrays, even after normalization, is common for many genes. Proper experimental design and analysis are crucial for accurate gene expression comparisons.

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • Microarray experiments use spot intensity to measure gene expression.
  • Dye bias is an artifactual intensity difference caused by labeling dyes, not gene expression.
  • Uncorrected dye bias can skew comparisons between samples.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To characterize dye bias in dual-label microarray experiments.
  • To determine if dye bias is removed by normalization or requires specific experimental design.
  • To assess the impact of dye bias on gene expression analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of two large-scale tissue culture experiments (>27 arrays each).
  • Utilized extensive dye-swap arrays with indirect, amino-allyl labeling.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluated various normalization methods (median-centering, loess) and statistical analyses (parametric, rank-based, permutation-based).

    • Main Results:

    • Post-normalization dye bias, consistent across samples, was observed for many genes.
    • This consistent dye bias was robust across different normalization and statistical methods.
    • Sample-specific dye biases were found for a small subset of genes but had minimal impact on expression differences.

    Conclusions:

    • Consistent dye bias persists post-normalization and necessitates control through experimental design and analysis.
    • While sample-specific biases exist, they have a limited effect on gene expression comparisons.
    • Accurate gene expression profiling requires careful characterization and correction of dye bias.