Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Improving pilot response to in-flight strokes: a randomized controlled trial.

Enrique C Leira1, Salvador Cruz-Flores, Kathleen W Wyrwich

  • 1Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Saint Louis University, Missouri, USA. enrique-leira@uiowa.edu

Cerebrovascular Diseases (Basel, Switzerland)
|March 19, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impact of Mavacamten on Disease-Related Symptoms in Patients With Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: HCMSQ Outcomes in EXPLORER-HCM.

Journal of cardiac failure·2026
Same author

Transition to tenecteplase is associated with shorter door-to-puncture times: a retrospective study from the Lone Star Stroke consortium TNK registry.

Frontiers in neurology·2026
Same author

Adjunctive Intra-Arterial Alteplase After Successful Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: The CHOICE-2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA·2026
Same author

Contrast-Induced Encephalopathy Due to Contrast Extravasation From a Chronic Post-hemorrhagic Encephalomalacic Region: Prior Hemorrhage as a Potential Risk Factor.

Cureus·2026
Same author

Author Correction: Methods for randomized, blinded, controlled evaluation of putative disease interventions in multilaboratory, preclinical assessment networks.

Lab animal·2026
Same author

Methods for randomized, blinded, controlled evaluation of putative disease interventions in multilaboratory, preclinical assessment networks.

Lab animal·2026

Pilots responded less to in-flight strokes than heart attacks, but an educational intervention improved their simulated emergency declarations. Fear of employer retaliation was a key barrier to pilot pro-activeness for in-flight stroke events.

Area of Science:

  • Aviation Medicine
  • Neurology
  • Emergency Medical Services

Background:

  • Pilot pro-activeness in expediting ground care for in-flight strokes (IFS) is crucial for patient outcomes.
  • Limited understanding exists regarding pilot stroke pro-activeness and associated limiting factors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess pilot pro-activeness in responding to simulated in-flight strokes.
  • To evaluate the impact of a stroke awareness educational intervention on pilot decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized controlled trial using an internet-based stroke awareness lecture.
  • 104 pilot students and instructors completed pre- and post-intervention tests with simulated in-flight scenarios.
  • Outcomes measured included use of medical radio, emergency declarations, and airport diversions.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Pilots were less likely to respond to simulated IFS compared to myocardial infarction (p < 0.001).
  • Fear of employer retaliation emerged as the primary modifiable limitation.
  • The educational program significantly increased simulated emergency declarations for specific stroke types (p < 0.001).

Conclusions:

  • Immediate improvement in pilot-simulated response to certain IFS was observed post-intervention.
  • Dissemination of this educational program in aviation training is recommended.
  • Further research is needed on long-term benefits and actual diversion rates; airline policies should protect pilots from retaliation.