Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evidence-based expert testimony.

William Meadow1

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, The University of Chicago Children's Hospital, 5825 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago IL, 60637 USA. WLM1@uchicago.edu

Clinics in Perinatology
|March 22, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Worth a Try? Describing the Experiences of Families during the Course of Care in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit When the Prognosis is Poor.

The Journal of pediatrics·2018
Same author

Opportunities and difficulties for counseling at the margins of viability.

Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine·2017
Same author

Contemporary and diverse approaches to perinatal ethics.

Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine·2017
Same author

Should Neonatologists Give Opinions Withdrawing Life-sustaining Treatment?

Pediatrics·2016
Same author

Population-Based Outcomes Data for Counseling at the Margin of Gestational Viability.

The Journal of pediatrics·2016
Same author

A Comparison of Prenatal and Postnatal Models to Predict Outcomes at the Border of Viability.

The Journal of pediatrics·2016

Expert witnesses, often doctors, can be influenced by memory biases. This article examines the behavior of expert witnesses and proposes guidelines for their testimony.

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Psychology
  • Legal Medicine

Background:

  • Expert witnesses possess specialized knowledge beyond laypersons.
  • Like all individuals, experts are susceptible to cognitive biases, including memory biases.
  • The legal system relies heavily on expert testimony, particularly from medical professionals, in plaintiff cases.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the conduct of expert witnesses in legal proceedings.
  • To explore the factors that should govern expert testimony.
  • To discuss the implementation of guidelines for expert witnesses.

Main Methods:

  • This article reviews the existing literature and professional practices concerning expert witnesses.
  • It examines the ethical and practical challenges posed by expert testimony.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The analysis focuses on the behavior of both plaintiff and defense experts.

    • Main Results:

    • Expert witnesses, despite their expertise, are prone to memory biases.
    • The article highlights the critical role of plaintiff's medical experts in litigation.
    • It raises questions about the current standards and oversight of expert testimony.

    Conclusions:

    • There is a need for clear guidelines to direct expert testimony.
    • Effective implementation of these guidelines is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the legal process.
    • The legal and medical professions must address the challenges of expert witness bias and conduct.