Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

Investigating von Willebrand Factor Pathophysiology Using a Flow Chamber Model of von Willebrand Factor-platelet String Formation
Published on: August 14, 2017
The "cutting" edge: von Willebrand factor-cleaving protease activity in thrombotic microangiopathies
Richard L Haspel1, Petr Jarolím
1Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
The thrombotic microangiopathies (TMAs), including thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) and hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), are classically defined by constellations of clinical findings. In the late 1990's, several groups reported that a single test might be able to diagnose TTP and distinguish it from HUS. This test was an assay to detect von Willebrand factor-cleaving protease activity. Although there has been debate in the literature as to the utility of this assay, review of the available data suggests that this test can separate the idiopathic TMAs into three distinct categories: (1) patients who are protease positive with severe renal failure (similar to classic HUS), (2) patients who are protease positive without severe renal failure and (3) patients who are protease negative. While the latter two categories may appear similar to TTP at presentation, the prognosis differs in each of these groups of patients. Through use of the protease assay clinicians will be better able to diagnose, treat, predict outcome and design clinical trials.
The thrombotic microangiopathies (TMAs), including thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) and hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), are classically defined by constellations of clinical findings. In the late 1990's, several groups reported that a single test might be able to diagnose TTP and distinguish it from HUS. This test was an assay to detect von Willebrand factor-cleaving protease activity. Although there has been debate in the literature as to the utility of this assay, review of the available data suggests that this test can separate the idiopathic TMAs into three distinct categories: (1) patients who are protease positive with severe renal failure (similar to classic HUS), (2) patients who are protease positive without severe renal failure and (3) patients who are protease negative. While the latter two categories may appear similar to TTP at presentation, the prognosis differs in each of these groups of patients. Through use of the protease assay clinicians will be better able to diagnose, treat, predict outcome and design clinical trials.
Related Concept Videos
Clot Retraction and Fibrinolysis
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Formation of the Platelet Plug
As the injured blood vessel contracts, endothelial cells undergo contraction, revealing collagen fibers in the basement membrane and underlying connective tissue. Furthermore, the plasma membrane of endothelial cells becomes adhesive, preparing the site for platelet adhesion. Platelets...
Regulation of Angiogenesis and Blood Supply
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins

