Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

Robust Comparison of Protein Levels Across Tissues and Throughout Development Using Standardized Quantitative Western Blotting
Published on: April 9, 2019
Partitioning of limiting protein and energy in the growing pig: testing quantitative rules against experimental data
Fredrik B Sandberg1, Gerry C Emmans, Ilias Kyriazakis
1Animal Nutrition and Health Department, Scottish Agricultural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK. Fredrik.Sandberg@sac.ac.uk
Abstract:
Literature solutions to the problem of protein and energy partitioning in the growing pig are quantitatively examined. Possible effects of live weight, genotype and food composition on the marginal response in protein retention to protein and energy intakes, on protein and energy-limiting foods are quantified. No evidence was found that the marginal response in protein retention to ideal protein supply, when protein intake is limiting, is affected by live weight, genotype or environmental temperature. There was good evidence that live weight does not affect the marginal response in protein retention to energy intake when protein intake is not limiting. Limited data for different genotypes suggested no effects on this response. A general quantitative partitioning rule is proposed that has two key parameters; e(p)* (the maximum marginal efficiency for retaining the first limiting amino acid) and R* (the maximum value of R, the energy to protein ratio of the food, MJ metabolisable energy (ME)/kg digestible crude protein (DCP), when e(p)* is just achieved). When R

