Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Frontal lobe mechanisms that resolve proactive interference.

David Badre1, Anthony D Wagner

  • 1Department of Psychology and Neurosciences Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. badred@mit.edu

Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)
|March 25, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Task context is broadly encoded in the human brain.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Effects of α-synuclein pathology on synaptic dysfunction and clinical outcomes in normal aging.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2026
Same author

Plasma proteomic signatures of preclinical Alzheimer's disease in clinically unimpaired older adults.

Molecular neurodegeneration·2026
Same author

Hippocampal patterns and associative memory: Distinct intracranial EEG temporal encoding patterns support memory.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

OMG! A proteomic determinant of neurodegenerative resiliency.

Molecular neurodegeneration·2026
Same author

Biomarkers.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2025
Same journal

Differentiation of cortical areas: effects of free energy minimization with broken symmetry.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
Same journal

Prior exposure to speech rapidly modulates cortical processing of high-level linguistic structure.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
Same journal

Beta bursts in SMA mediate anticipatory muscle inhibition.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
Same journal

Cognitive load modulates the effects of social contexts on facial expression processing.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
Same journal

The neural mechanisms of aligning spatial perspectives.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
Same journal

Relationships between bilateral tapping skills and brain gray matter volumes: a voxel-based morphometry study.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
See all related articles

New research shows the left mid-ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (mid-VLPFC) and fronto-polar cortex are key in resolving proactive interference (PI). This brain activity helps manage memory conflicts during new tasks.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neuroimaging
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Proactive interference (PI) occurs when prior memories impede new learning or task performance.
  • The left mid-ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (mid-VLPFC) is implicated in resolving PI during short-term recognition memory.
  • Mechanisms underlying PI resolution require further elucidation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the neural mechanisms of proactive interference (PI) resolution using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).
  • To differentiate the roles of brain regions, specifically the left mid-VLPFC, in managing memory interference.
  • To constrain theoretical models of PI resolution by examining brain activity during recognition tasks with varying levels of interference.

Main Methods:

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was employed to monitor brain activity.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Participants performed a recognition memory task involving target word sets and probe words.
  • Trials were manipulated to include 'recent' probes (from the previous trial) to induce PI, alongside standard negative and positive trials.

    • Main Results:

    • Behavioral data showed increased response times and errors on negative-recent trials, confirming PI.
    • fMRI revealed increased activation in the left mid-VLPFC and bilateral fronto-polar cortex during negative recency trials.
    • Recency effects on brain activation were observed in both positive and negative trials, with greater mid-VLPFC engagement on negative trials.

    Conclusions:

    • The findings support a multi-component model of PI resolution involving the left mid-VLPFC and fronto-polar cortex.
    • Differential activation patterns in the mid-VLPFC suggest a specific role in managing interference on negative recognition trials.
    • This study refines our understanding of the neural basis of memory interference and its resolution.