Related Experiment Videos
Social exclusion impairs self-regulation.
Roy F Baumeister1, C Nathan DeWall1, Natalie J Ciarocco2
1Department of Psychology, Florida State University.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
|March 31, 2005
Summary
Social exclusion and rejection impair self-regulation, reducing effort in tasks and attention. However, incentives and self-awareness can restore self-control abilities in rejected individuals.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Social Psychology
- Behavioral Science
Background:
- Self-regulation is crucial for goal pursuit and well-being.
- Social exclusion is a common human experience with potential negative consequences.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of social exclusion and rejection on self-regulation.
- To identify factors that may mitigate the effects of exclusion on self-control.
Main Methods:
- Six experiments were conducted involving social exclusion manipulations.
- Participants' self-regulation was assessed through tasks measuring dietary choices, persistence, and attention.
- Interventions such as financial incentives and self-awareness exercises were employed in later experiments.
Main Results:
- Social exclusion consistently led to decrements in self-regulation across various domains.
- Excluded participants showed reduced ability to resist unhealthy food choices and were less persistent on difficult tasks.
- Attention regulation, measured by dichotic listening, was impaired following exclusion.
- Financial incentives and increased self-awareness effectively eliminated the negative impact of exclusion on self-regulation.
Conclusions:
- Social exclusion significantly undermines individuals' capacity for self-regulation.
- Despite impaired self-control, individuals who experience rejection are capable of self-regulation when motivated.
- Interventions aimed at increasing self-awareness or providing incentives can restore self-regulatory functions in the face of social exclusion.