Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Diagnosis of a malignant lymph node].

J Frija1, P Bourrier, A M Zagdanski

  • 1Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Saint Louis, 1 avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75475 Paris cedex 10. jacques.frija@sls.ap-hop-paris.fr

Journal De Radiologie
|March 31, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Different imaging methods aid in lymph node evaluation, but distinguishing reactive from metastatic nodes can be challenging. Advanced techniques like CT-PET offer improved diagnostic accuracy for malignancy staging.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Accuracy of two connected devices for SpO<sub>2</sub> sampling: Observational study].

Revue des maladies respiratoires·2026
Same author

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: Update on French practices and position paper of the SFRMS, SPLF and SFORL sleep medicine work-group.

European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases·2025
Same author

Prognostic value of PET/CT and CT in T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma/leukaemia patients: A retrospective cohort study of 145 patients.

British journal of haematology·2023
Same author

Salvage Percutaneous Cryoablation for Bleeding Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.

Cardiovascular and interventional radiology·2022
Same author

Image-guided lymph node core-needle biopsy predicts survival in mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome.

The British journal of dermatology·2021
Same author

Interventional oncology at the time of COVID-19 pandemic: Problems and solutions.

Diagnostic and interventional imaging·2020

Area of Science:

  • Radiology and Imaging
  • Oncology
  • Pathology

Background:

  • Lymph node assessment is crucial for cancer staging and diagnosis.
  • Various imaging modalities possess distinct strengths and weaknesses in evaluating lymph nodes.
  • Differentiating benign reactive lymphadenopathy from metastatic involvement remains a diagnostic challenge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and compare different imaging techniques for lymph node evaluation.
  • To discuss the diagnostic capabilities and limitations of each modality.
  • To outline imaging work-up strategies for lymph node assessment in selected malignancies.

Main Methods:

  • Computed radiography (CR) and computed tomography (CT) for lymph node size and morphology.
  • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting fibrotic changes.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Ultrasound (US) with Doppler for evaluating lymph node vascularity.
  • Nuclear medicine for sentinel lymph node identification.
  • Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) for combined morphologic and metabolic assessment.

    • Main Results:

    • CT easily identifies enlarged lymph nodes but struggles to differentiate reactive from metastatic causes.
    • MRI may reveal fibrotic changes in scarred nodes.
    • Doppler US highlights abnormal vascular patterns in metastatic nodes.
    • Sentinel lymph node biopsy is facilitated by nuclear imaging.
    • CT-PET enhances diagnostic accuracy by integrating anatomical and functional data.

    Conclusions:

    • No single imaging technique is definitive for all lymph node assessments.
    • A combination of imaging modalities, tailored to the clinical context and malignancy, optimizes diagnostic yield.
    • Advanced techniques like CT-PET significantly improve the accuracy of lymph node staging.