Endopyelotomy in childhood: our experience with 37 patients

Béla Tállai1, Morshed Ali Salah, Tibor Flaskó

  • 1Department of Urology, University of Debrecen Medical and Health Science Center, Debrecen, Hungary. btallai@freemail.hu

Insights

Endopyelotomy is a safe and effective treatment for ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) stricture in children. This study shows an 89% success rate in pediatric patients, with minimal complications.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Urology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Urologic Oncology

Background:

  • Ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) stricture is a common cause of congenital hydronephrosis in children.
  • Endopyelotomy offers a less invasive alternative to open pyeloplasty for UPJ obstruction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the safety and efficacy of endopyelotomy in treating pediatric patients with UPJ stricture.
  • To assess the long-term outcomes and complication rates associated with this procedure in a pediatric cohort.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective review of 37 pediatric patients who underwent percutaneous antegrade endopyelotomy for UPJ stricture between 1990 and 2002.
  • The procedure involved fluoroscopic guidance, cold knife incision of the UPJ, and stenting with a transrenal drain or double-J catheter.

Main Results:

  • The overall success rate of endopyelotomy was 89% at 1-year follow-up.
  • One patient required repeat procedure due to drain dislodgement; two patients needed open pyeloplasty or nephrectomy for complications.
  • The average postoperative hospital stay was 6 days.

Conclusions:

  • Endopyelotomy is a safe and effective treatment option for UPJ stricture in the pediatric population.
  • Experienced surgeons can achieve high success rates, comparable to adult outcomes.
  • This minimally invasive approach provides a valuable alternative for managing UPJ obstruction in children.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos