Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

The problems with interviews.

Karl Nunkoosing¹

¹University of Portsmouth, United Kingdom.

Qualitative Health Research

|April 2, 2005

Summary

This study critically examines the persistent methodological and theoretical challenges inherent in using interviews for qualitative research. It explores issues of power dynamics, truth versus authenticity, and informed consent in the context of understanding the self and personal narratives.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Experiences of living without a sense of smell: Like "Being Behind Glass".

PloS one·2023

Same author

Maintaining dignity and managing stigma in the interview encounter: the challenge of paid-for participation.

Qualitative health research·2008

Same author

Using grounded theory to examine people's attitudes toward how animals are used.

Society & animals : social scientific studies of the human experience of other animals·2004

See all related articles

Area of Science:

Social Sciences
Qualitative Research Methodology

Background:

Interviews are a popular tool in qualitative research.
Despite their popularity, significant methodological and theoretical issues persist.

Purpose of the Study:

To critically examine the methodological and theoretical problems associated with using interviews in qualitative research.
To foster a dialogue on navigating these challenges for researchers.

Main Methods:

Critical examination of existing literature and theoretical frameworks.
Analysis of key issues including power dynamics, truth vs. authenticity, and informed consent.

Main Results:

Identifies persistent problems in qualitative interviews related to power and resistance.
Discusses the difficulty in distinguishing truth from authenticity and the complexities of informed consent.
Explores the nature and significance of personal stories and the self in the interview process.

Conclusions:

The inherent challenges in qualitative interviews require ongoing critical engagement.
Addressing these issues is crucial for researchers seeking to understand the 'How can I know...?' question through interviews.

Related Experiment Videos