Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Physicians, cost control, and ethics.

D P Sulmasy1

  • 1Center for Clinical Bioethics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC.

Annals of Internal Medicine
|June 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Researchers' preferences and attitudes on ethical aspects of genomics research: a comparative study between the USA and Spain.

Journal of medical ethics·2009
Same author

Decision-making in patients with advanced cancer compared with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Journal of medical ethics·2008
Same author

Physicians' confidence in discussing do not resuscitate orders with patients and surrogates.

Journal of medical ethics·2008
Same author

On the current state of clinical ethics.

Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)·2004
Same author

Patient expectations of benefit from phase I clinical trials: linguistic considerations in diagnosing a therapeutic misconception.

Theoretical medicine and bioethics·2003
Same author

Catholic health care: not dead yet.

The national Catholic bioethics quarterly·2003
Same journal

Correction to I.M. Matters News: Sleep medicine for seniors.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Adverse Events After Same-Day COVID-19 and Influenza Vaccination Versus Influenza Vaccination Alone : A Target Trial Emulation.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Leveraging Real-World Evidence to Inform Regulatory, Clinical, and Coverage Decisions Related to Glucagon-Like Peptide-1-Based Therapies: Synopsis of a National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Workshop.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Methodological Approaches to Real-World Evidence Generation for Glucagon-like Peptide-1-Based Therapies: Synopsis of a National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Workshop.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Weekly and Biweekly Treatment With Bofanglutide Versus Semaglutide in Chinese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes : A Phase 2b Randomized Clinical Trial.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Grappling with GLP-1 prescribing.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
See all related articles

Physicians making unilateral healthcare rationing decisions are unethical. A just system requires transparency, physician advocacy, and equal treatment for all patients to control costs effectively.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Health Economics
  • Public Health Policy

Background:

  • Rising healthcare expenditures necessitate cost-control measures.
  • Physicians' roles in cost control raise significant ethical concerns.
  • Current cost-control proposals often involve physician-led rationing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the ethical implications of physicians' involvement in healthcare cost control.
  • To evaluate the moral acceptability of different cost-control strategies.
  • To propose an ethically sound framework for managing healthcare costs.

Main Methods:

  • Ethical analysis of physician-led rationing and restrictive gatekeeping.
  • Comparative evaluation of proposed cost-control mechanisms.
Keywords:
Analytical ApproachHealth Care and Public Health

Related Experiment Videos

  • Development of principles for a morally sound healthcare cost-control system.

    • Main Results:

    • Unilateral rationing by individual physicians is morally unacceptable due to arbitrariness and injustice.
    • Restrictive gatekeeping creates moral stress for physicians and erodes patient trust.
    • Current methods often disguise responsibility and ration care based on patient class.

    Conclusions:

    • A morally sound system must ensure transparency, just responsibility, and physician advocacy for patients.
    • Physicians should be encouraged to act in patients' best interests, fostering trust.
    • Ethical cost control requires public input and equitable application to all societal members.