Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2026

09:34
Assessing Differences in Sperm Competitive Ability in Drosophila
Published on: August 22, 2013
Selection on mothers and offspring: whose phenotype is it and does it matter?
Alastair J Wilson1, Jill G Pilkington, Josephine M Pemberton
1Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, United Kingdom. alastair.wilson@ed.ac.uk
Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution
|April 6, 2005
Summary
Antagonistic selection impacts reproductive traits in Soay sheep. Offspring and maternal fitness optima differ, influencing evolution of birth weight, date, and litter size.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary biology
- Quantitative genetics
- Animal ecology
Background:
- Reproductive and early life-history traits are key to offspring and maternal fitness.
- Evolution of these traits depends on selection acting on both offspring and maternal components of fitness.
- Antagonistic selection can occur when optimal phenotypic values for offspring and maternal fitness differ.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate selection regimes on correlated reproductive traits (birth weight, birth date, litter size) in a free-living Soay sheep population.
- To test the hypothesis that antagonistic selection, acting at offspring and maternal levels or on correlated traits, imposes evolutionary constraints.
- To understand how assigning traits to offspring or maternal phenotype influences selection.
Main Methods:
- Utilized long-term study data from a free-living Soay sheep (Ovis aries) population in St. Kilda, Scotland.
- Analyzed selection on birth weight, birth date, and litter size using variance in short-term and lifetime fitness measures.
- Examined selection at both offspring and maternal levels to identify antagonistic pressures.
Main Results:
- All three traits (birth weight, birth date, litter size) were under selection impacting fitness.
- Lifetime fitness analysis showed positive directional selection for birth weight and birth date.
- Evidence of stabilizing selection on birth weight and birth date at the maternal level, with lower optima than for offspring.
- Antagonistic selection on litter size: singletons favored by offspring, larger litters by mothers.
- Reduced fitness of twins linked to lower birth weight, indicating trade-offs.
Conclusions:
- Selection regimes on reproductive traits are complex and depend on whether traits are viewed as offspring or maternal.
- Antagonistic selection between offspring and maternal fitness optima creates evolutionary constraints.
- Trade-offs between litter size and birth weight, with differing optimal resolutions for mothers and offspring, drive antagonistic selection.
- Understanding the dual roles of traits in offspring and maternal fitness is crucial for evolutionary studies.
Related Concept Videos
Mate Choice
Mate choice—the decision about whom to mate with—is a type of natural selection, since animals must reproduce to pass down their genes. Mate choice is also called intersexual selection because the behavior occurs between the sexes.
Types of Selection
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
Frequency-dependent Selection
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.Positive Frequency-Dependent SelectionIn positive...
Law of Segregation
When crossing pea plants, Mendel noticed that one of the parental traits would sometimes disappear in the first generation of offspring, called the F1 generation, and could reappear in the next generation (F2). He concluded that one of the traits must be dominant over the other, thereby causing masking of one trait in the F1 generation. When he crossed the F1 plants, he found that 75% of the offspring in the F2 generation had the dominant phenotype, while 25% had the recessive phenotype.
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
Although the genetic makeup of an organism plays a major role in determining the phenotype, there are also several environmental factors, such as temperature, oxygen availability, presence of mutagens, that can alter an organism’s phenotype.
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
Natural Selection and Mating Preferences
The principle of natural selection posits that organisms better adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. This principle is closely intertwined with mating preferences, a key aspect of sexual selection, which evolutionary psychologists believe is driven by instincts to propagate one's genes. Such instincts significantly influence mating behaviors and preferences between genders.
Females, due to their biological roles in conception, pregnancy, and nursing, inherently...
Females, due to their biological roles in conception, pregnancy, and nursing, inherently...

