Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Surgery for urogenital prolapse].

M D Moen1

  • 1Division of Urogynecology, Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, Illinois, USA. michael.moen-md@advocatehealth.com

Revista De Medicina De La Universidad De Navarra
|April 7, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Traditional native tissue versus mesh-augmented pelvic organ prolapse repairs: providing an accurate interpretation of current literature.

International urogynecology journal·2011
Same author

Effect of amnioinfusion on the incidence of postpartum endometritis in patients undergoing cesarean delivery.

The Journal of reproductive medicine·1995
Same author

Stage III papillary serous cystadenocarcinoma of the ovary in a 15-year-old female.

Gynecologic oncology·1994
Same author

Hepatic rupture in pregnancy associated with cocaine use.

Obstetrics and gynecology·1993

Urogenital prolapse affects many women, increasing with age. Surgical repair options exist, often performed vaginally, to address pelvic support defects and improve quality of life.

Area of Science:

  • Urogynecology
  • Pelvic Floor Surgery

Background:

  • Urogenital prolapse significantly impacts quality of life, with increasing prevalence in aging populations.
  • Approximately 11% of women face surgery for prolapse or incontinence in their lifetime.
  • Symptomatic prolapse often involves multiple pelvic support defects requiring comprehensive surgical repair.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline the anatomic approach to surgical correction of urogenital prolapse.
  • To review various surgical techniques for pelvic support restoration.
  • To discuss the benefits and limitations of different surgical approaches, including vaginal, laparoscopic, and graft reinforcement.

Main Methods:

  • Review of anatomical principles of pelvic support.
  • Description of surgical procedures for apical, anterior, and posterior compartment defects.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of vaginal, laparoscopic, and graft augmentation techniques.

    • Main Results:

    • Multiple surgical options exist for apical support (culdoplasty, ligament suspension, colpopexy), anterior repair (colporrhaphy, paravaginal repair), and posterior repair (colporrhaphy, rectovaginal repair, perineorrhaphy).
    • Vaginal surgery is often preferred, avoiding laparotomy risks.
    • Laparoscopic approaches show promise but require long-term data; graft reinforcement may improve outcomes, especially for recurrent prolapse, but carries risks.

    Conclusions:

    • Anatomic understanding guides comprehensive surgical repair of urogenital prolapse.
    • Vaginal surgery is a common and effective approach.
    • Graft use warrants further study regarding efficacy and safety, particularly mesh-related risks.