Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The "nation's conscience:" assessing bioethics commissions as public forums.

Albert W Dzur1, Daniel Levin

  • 1Social Philosophy & Policy Center, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH, USA.

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
|April 9, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Autoantibodies and Relapse of Systemic Sclerosis After Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

The Journal of rheumatology·2026
Same author

Metastatic Prostate Carcinoma to the Ankle Seen on Bone Scintigraphy and Extended Field-of-View PSMA PET/CT.

Clinical nuclear medicine·2024
Same author

Exploring the Intersection of Autism, Theory of Mind, and Driving Performance in Novice Drivers.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders·2024
Same author

Burned-Out Testicular Carcinoma Presenting as Inferior Vena Cava Tumor Thrombus With Pulmonary Tumor Embolism on FDG PET/CT: A Case Report.

Clinical nuclear medicine·2024
Same author

A novel method for culturing enteric neurons generates neurospheres containing functional myenteric neuronal subtypes.

Journal of neuroscience methods·2024
Same author

Uncommon Detection of Leiomyoma in the Penile Corpus Spongiosum Using FDG PET/CT: A Case Report.

Clinical nuclear medicine·2024

Standard measures of success for national bioethics commissions overlook their crucial role as public forums. Evaluating public engagement, like addressing citizen concerns and monitoring opinion, offers a more democratic assessment.

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Political Science
  • Public Health Policy

Background:

  • National bioethics commissions play a role in addressing complex ethical issues.
  • Assessing the success of these commissions is vital for understanding their impact.
  • Traditional metrics may not fully capture the multifaceted contributions of such bodies.

Observation:

  • Current evaluations of bioethics commissions often focus narrowly on policy influence.
  • This overlooks their function as platforms for public discourse and engagement.
  • Democratic theory suggests public engagement is a critical measure of success for deliberative bodies.

Findings:

  • Commissions serve as essential public forums, engaging citizens on healthcare ethics.
  • They facilitate understanding of public moral reasoning in medical contexts.
Keywords:
Analytical ApproachBioethics and Professional EthicsBiomedical Ethics Advisory CommitteeNational Bioethics Advisory CommissionNational Commission for the Protection of Human SubjectsPresident's Commission for the Study of Ethical ProblemsPresident's Council on Bioethics

Related Experiment Videos

  • Monitoring public opinion is a key aspect of their democratic role.

    • Implications:

    • A broader assessment framework is needed to evaluate bioethics commissions.
    • Recognizing their public forum role enhances understanding of democratic deliberation in science.
    • This perspective aligns with bioethics' history as a reform movement and historical social issue commissions.