Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Potentiality, irreversibility, and death.

John P Lizza1

  • 1Department of Philosophy, Kutztown University of Pennsylvania, Kutztown, PA 19530, USA. lizza@kutztown.edu

The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy
|April 9, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Response to Commentaries on "Defining Death: towards a Biological and Ethical Synthesis".

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2025
Same author

The Uniform Determination of Death Act Does Not Require the Loss of All Brain Function.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2025
Same author

The Necessity of Brain Blood Flow Testing in Thoracoabdominal Normothermic Regional Perfusion.

Transplantation·2025
Same author

Death and the Inescapability of Value Judgments.

Chest·2024
Same author

Defining Death: Toward a Biological and Ethical Synthesis.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2024
Same author

Donors and Organs at the Borders of Vitality and Public Trust: Why DCD Donors Must Be Dead and Not Dying.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2023
Same journal

Neurobiological Determinism versus Human Freedom: Competing Explanatory Models and the Hope for Moral Enhancement.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Zygotes are Persisting Organisms.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Ethical Examination of Genetic Enhancement from the Perspective of Confucian Human Dignity.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Reproducing Anachronism: Ageing, Fertility and Inequality in Reproductive Governance.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Genetic Moral Enhancement-A View Based on Mencius' Theory of Human Nature.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Egalitarian Justice and the Prevalence Principle in Human Genome Editing.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
See all related articles

Concerns about the definition of death and organ donation stem from misunderstandings of potentiality and irreversibility. This study clarifies these concepts, supporting neurological criteria for death and ethical organ donation practices.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Neuroscience
  • Philosophy of Medicine

Background:

  • Growing debate exists regarding the irreversible nature of death, particularly concerning neurological criteria and non-heart-beating organ donation.
  • Concerns focus on the potential for recovery in individuals declared dead based on neurological criteria.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the concepts of potentiality and irreversibility in discussions on the definition of death.
  • To analyze D. Alan Shewmon's challenge to neurological criteria for death.
  • To propose a realistic understanding of irreversibility for death criteria and organ donation.

Main Methods:

  • Philosophical analysis of the concepts of potentiality and irreversibility.
  • Critique of D. Alan Shewmon's arguments regarding neurological death criteria.
Keywords:
AristotleDeath and EuthanasiaHealth Care and Public HealthPhilosophical Approach

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of discussions surrounding non-heart-beating organ donation.

    • Main Results:

    • Shewmon's concept of potentiality is deemed problematic and unrealistic.
    • A more realistic concept of potentiality aligns with accepting neurological criteria for death.
    • Certain discussions on irreversibility in organ donation also employ unrealistic concepts.

    Conclusions:

    • A refined understanding of potentiality supports neurological criteria for death.
    • A realistic account of irreversibility is crucial for defining death and ethical organ donation.
    • This work offers a framework for understanding irreversibility in medical contexts.