Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Beating heart surgery: does it make a difference?

Michael J Mack1

  • 1Medical City Dallas Hospital and the Cardiopulmonary Research Science and Technology Institute (CRSTI), Dallas, TX 75230, USA. mjmack@earthlink.net

The American Heart Hospital Journal
|April 9, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impact of Optimal Medical Therapy on 10-Year Mortality After Coronary Revascularization.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2021
Same author

Impact of Predilation During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Insights From the PARTNER 3 Trial.

Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions·2021
Same author

Utilization, Costs, and Outcomes of Conscious Sedation Versus General Anesthesia for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions·2021
Same author

Reply: Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair: When Is the Last Moment Before Crossing the Styx River?

Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2021
Same author

Differences in Administrative Claims Data for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Between International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Tenth Revision Coding.

JAMA cardiology·2021
Same author

Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery after previous sternotomy: A propensity-matched analysis.

Journal of cardiac surgery·2021
Same journal

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection presenting with stroke.

The American heart hospital journal·2014
Same journal

Acute Myocardial Infarction Secondary to Suspected Paradoxical Emboli through Patent Foramen Ovale in a Young Woman.

The American heart hospital journal·2014
Same journal

Life-threatening Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy.

The American heart hospital journal·2014
Same journal

Late-term Post-operative Recanalization of a Fistula between the Coronary Artery and Bronchial Vein.

The American heart hospital journal·2014
Same journal

A rare location and presentation of papillary fibroelastoma.

The American heart hospital journal·2014
Same journal

Acute pericarditis superimposed on right bundle branch block, posterior fascicular block, and interatrial block.

The American heart hospital journal·2014
See all related articles

Off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, performed without cardiopulmonary bypass, shows significant benefits. These include reduced complications, shorter recovery, and cost savings, especially for high-risk patients.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Minimally Invasive Cardiac Procedures

Background:

  • Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery traditionally uses cardiopulmonary bypass.
  • Off-pump CABG techniques emerged in the mid-1990s to mitigate bypass-related complications.
  • Advancements in technology now enable routine off-pump CABG with hemodynamic stability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the outcomes and benefits of off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.
  • To compare off-pump CABG with traditional on-pump CABG in terms of complications and patient outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature and large retrospective databases.
  • Analysis of outcomes data for patients undergoing off-pump CABG.
  • Focus on perioperative complications and patient subgroups.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Off-pump CABG demonstrates strong evidence of benefit in reduced blood loss, fewer postoperative renal failures, decreased sternal infections, and less myocardial injury.
  • Significant improvements observed in extubation time, length of hospital stay, and overall cost savings.
  • Particular advantages noted in high-risk patient groups, including the elderly, reoperative cases, and those with comorbidities.

Conclusions:

  • Off-pump CABG maintains excellent surgical results while significantly reducing perioperative complications.
  • The technique offers substantial benefits, especially for vulnerable patient populations.
  • While mortality benefits require further large-scale trials, evidence strongly supports reduced morbidity and improved resource utilization.