Related Experiment Videos
Education and telephone case management for children with type 1 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial
Carol J Howe1, Abbas F Jawad, Alan K Tuttle
1Diabetes Center for Children, The Children's Hospital of Philadephia, PA 19104, USA.
Insights
Telephone case management improved adherence in children with type 1 diabetes. While glycemic control (HbA1c) did not significantly differ, adherence scores were higher in the education plus telephone case management group.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Endocrinology
- Nursing
Background:
- Type 1 diabetes management in children requires effective nursing interventions.
- Glycemic control is crucial for preventing long-term complications.
- Parent-child dynamics and knowledge impact diabetes self-care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the impact of standard care, education, and education plus telephone case management on pediatric type 1 diabetes outcomes.
- To assess the effectiveness of nursing interventions on glycemic control, knowledge, teamwork, and adherence.
Main Methods:
- Randomized controlled trial with 75 children (mean age 12.5 years).
- Three groups: Standard Care (SC), Education (ED), Education + Telephone Case Management (ED + TCM).
- Primary outcome: Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c); Secondary: Diabetes Knowledge (KNOW), Teamwork (TEAM), Adherence (ADH).
Main Results:
- No significant differences in HbA1c among the three groups after 6 months.
- Slight improvements in KNOW and TEAM in ED and ED + TCM groups, but not statistically significant.
- Significant improvement in ADH scores for the ED + TCM group compared to SC and ED groups.
Conclusions:
- Education plus telephone case management enhances adherence in pediatric type 1 diabetes.
- While direct impact on HbA1c was not significant, improved adherence may lead to better long-term glycemic control.
- Recruitment and retention challenges in pediatric diabetes research were noted.
Abstract:
The purpose of the study was to compare three nursing interventions and their impact on glycemic control among children with type I diabetes. The 75 subjects' mean +/- SD age was 12.5 +/- 3.4 years, 55% were boys, and 55% were White. Subjects were randomly assigned to a standard care (SC), an education (ED), or an education and telephone case management (ED + TCM) group. The primary outcome measure was glycemic control (hemoglobin A1c, or HbA1c). Secondary outcome measures were diabetes knowledge (KNOW), parent-child teamwork (TEAM), and adherence (ADH). After 6 months of follow-up, results demonstrated no significant differences among groups in HbA1c. KNOW and TEAM scores improved slightly in the ED and ED + TCM groups, but no statistically significant differences were found among the three groups. Significant improvement in ADH scores among ED + TCM groups was reported when compared with the ED and SC groups. This change may represent a move toward improved adherence to diabetes care and subsequent improvement in diabetes control. The challenges of recruitment and retention of subjects in this study will also be discussed.
Related Concept Videos
Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Diabetes Mellitus: Overview and Type I Subtype
Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease in which the immune system mistakenly attacks and destroys the insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas. As a result, the body is unable to produce sufficient insulin, and individuals with...
Type I Diabetes I: Introduction
Type II Diabetes I: Introduction
Type I Diabetes II: Pathophysiology