Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Aortic valve repair.

James S Tweddell1, Andrew N Pelech, Robert D B Jaquiss

  • 1Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee 53226, USA.

Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Pediatric Cardiac Surgery Annual
|April 9, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Awaiting Full Translation: Cardiopulmonary Bypass Pulsatility, Flow, and Outcomes.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2026
Same author

Mesenteric perfusion at rest and during feeding in healthy children.

Frontiers in network physiology·2026
Same author

Stress, coping, protective factors, and quality of life in parents of infants with CHD: associations with state anxiety.

Cardiology in the young·2026
Same author

Perioperative Complications in Multispecialty Surgical Care for Patients With Trisomy 21: A Single Center Retrospective Cohort Study.

Paediatric anaesthesia·2026
Same author

Ex Vivo Hydrodynamic Assessment of Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Trileaflet Pulmonary Valves.

ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992)·2025
Same author

Is All or Nothing Preferable to Anything Else?

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2025
Same journal

Surgical Approaches for Vascular-Related Aerodigestive Compression.

Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Pediatric cardiac surgery annual·2026
Same journal

Transcatheter Interventional Options in Pulmonary Vein Stenosis: When to Stent?

Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Pediatric cardiac surgery annual·2026
Same journal

Airway Malacia: Stent Innovations and Emerging Ex Vivo Testing Platforms.

Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Pediatric cardiac surgery annual·2026
Same journal

Bilateral Bronchus Suis Tracheoplasty.

Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Pediatric cardiac surgery annual·2026
Same journal

Pulmonary Atresia With Major Aorto-Pulmonary Collateral Arteries (MAPCAs): Timing and Type of Intervention.

Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Pediatric cardiac surgery annual·2026
Same journal

Pulmonary Atresia With Intact Ventricular Septum: Expert Review of the Surgical Management.

Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Pediatric cardiac surgery annual·2026
See all related articles

Aortic valve repair offers a viable alternative to valve replacement in children, showing good durability and hemodynamics. This approach is particularly effective for congenital aortic stenosis and insufficiency with ventricular septal defects.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Cardiology
  • Cardiac Surgery
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Limited options exist for pediatric aortic valve replacement, with inherent disadvantages.
  • Aortic valve repair techniques have evolved slowly and lack widespread adoption.
  • Previous studies indicate potential for valve repair with good early hemodynamics and intermediate durability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present the results of aortic valve repair at the Children's Hospital of Wisconsin.
  • To evaluate the efficacy and durability of various aortic valve repair techniques in pediatric patients.
  • To compare outcomes of aortic valve repair with aortic valve replacement in complex cases.

Main Methods:

  • Review of aortic valve repair cases at a pediatric hospital.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Categorization of repairs into simple (valvotomy, commissurotomy) and complex techniques.
  • Analysis of freedom from reintervention and reoperation rates at 5 and 10 years.
  • Comparison of repair outcomes with historical data for aortic valve replacement.

    • Main Results:

    • Simple repairs for congenital aortic stenosis showed 86% +/- 5% freedom from reintervention at 10 years.
    • Repair of aortic insufficiency with ventricular septal defect (VSD) resulted in 93.3% +/- 6% freedom from reoperation at 10 years.
    • Complex repairs demonstrated 83% +/- 7% 5-year freedom from reintervention, compared to 73% +/- 11% for aortic valve replacement (P = .62).

    Conclusions:

    • Aortic valve repair is a feasible alternative to aortic valve replacement in selected pediatric patients.
    • Outcomes should be assessed by freedom from reintervention, left ventricular mass regression, and exercise testing.
    • Improved patient selection and bioprosthetic materials are crucial for enhancing outcomes.