Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement
Published on: December 11, 2017
Aortic valve repair
James S Tweddell1, Andrew N Pelech, Robert D B Jaquiss
1Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee 53226, USA.
Insights
Aortic valve repair offers a viable alternative to valve replacement in children, showing good durability and hemodynamics. This approach is particularly effective for congenital aortic stenosis and insufficiency with ventricular septal defects.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Limited options exist for pediatric aortic valve replacement, with inherent disadvantages.
- Aortic valve repair techniques have evolved slowly and lack widespread adoption.
- Previous studies indicate potential for valve repair with good early hemodynamics and intermediate durability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present the results of aortic valve repair at the Children's Hospital of Wisconsin.
- To evaluate the efficacy and durability of various aortic valve repair techniques in pediatric patients.
- To compare outcomes of aortic valve repair with aortic valve replacement in complex cases.
Main Methods:
- Review of aortic valve repair cases at a pediatric hospital.
- Categorization of repairs into simple (valvotomy, commissurotomy) and complex techniques.
- Analysis of freedom from reintervention and reoperation rates at 5 and 10 years.
- Comparison of repair outcomes with historical data for aortic valve replacement.
Main Results:
- Simple repairs for congenital aortic stenosis showed 86% +/- 5% freedom from reintervention at 10 years.
- Repair of aortic insufficiency with ventricular septal defect (VSD) resulted in 93.3% +/- 6% freedom from reoperation at 10 years.
- Complex repairs demonstrated 83% +/- 7% 5-year freedom from reintervention, compared to 73% +/- 11% for aortic valve replacement (P = .62).
Conclusions:
- Aortic valve repair is a feasible alternative to aortic valve replacement in selected pediatric patients.
- Outcomes should be assessed by freedom from reintervention, left ventricular mass regression, and exercise testing.
- Improved patient selection and bioprosthetic materials are crucial for enhancing outcomes.
Abstract:
Aortic valve replacement options are limited in children, and all of them have disadvantages. Aortic valve repair techniques have evolved slowly and have not gained wide acceptance; however, large series using a variety of techniques demonstrate that valve repair is possible with excellent early hemodynamics and satisfactory intermediate durability. The results of aortic valve repair at the Children's Hospital of Wisconsin are presented. Simple repairs (blunt valvotomy, commissurotomy, or commissurotomy with leaflet thinning) directed at congenital aortic stenosis resulted in 86% +/- 5% freedom from reintervention at 10 years. Repair of aortic insufficiency with ventricular septal defect (VSD) resulted in 93.3% +/- 6% freedom from reoperation at 10 years. Complex repairs included a combination of techniques and yielded 5-year freedom from reintervention of 83% +/- 7% compared with 73% +/- 11% for patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (P = .62). Aortic valve repair provides an alternative to aortic valve replacement in selected patients. The utility of aortic valve repair and aortic valve replacement must be measured not only in freedom from reintervention but also in regression of left ventricular mass and exercise testing. Improvement in outcome depends on better patient selection and suitable bioprosthetic materials.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management

