Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
[Clinical value of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with congestive heart failure]
Insights
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improved heart failure symptoms, exercise capacity, and quality of life in patients. While effective for many, about 30% did not respond, highlighting the need for better patient selection criteria.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Heart Failure Management
Context:
- Severe chronic heart failure management has advanced with pharmacologic treatments and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
- CRT devices have become a significant therapeutic option over the past decade.
- This study focuses on the initial patient cohort receiving CRT at a specific hospital.
Purpose:
- To report the follow-up outcomes of the first 36 patients who received cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) between July 2000 and November 2002.
- To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of CRT in patients with severe chronic heart failure.
- To identify potential predictors of response to CRT.
Summary:
- After a mean 6-month follow-up, no deaths were recorded in the 36 patients who underwent CRT.
- Significant improvements were observed in NYHA class, 6-minute walk test distance (268m to 342m), quality of life (Minnesota-Living-In-CHF score: 49 to 35), and left ventricular ejection fraction (24% to 31%).
- While responders showed a correlation between functional class improvement and ejection fraction increase, non-responders (29%) require further investigation for predictive criteria.
Impact:
- CRT is a feasible, safe, and effective treatment for severe chronic heart failure not fully managed by medication.
- The study confirms functional benefits including improved exercise capacity and quality of life.
- Identifying criteria to predict and discriminate CRT responders is crucial, as approximately 30% of patients do not respond to therapy.
Abstract:
Besides major progress in the pharmacologic treatment of severe chronic heart failure, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has developped over the last ten years. We report the follow-up of the 36 first patients with a CRT device implanted from July 2000 to November 2002 at the CHR de la Citadelle Hospital in Liege. After a mean follow up of 6 months, no death was observed. The functional benefit of resynchronization is validated by a significant improvement in the NYHA class, an increase in the walking distance measured by the six minute walk test from 268 +/- 103 to 342 +/- 106 meters (p < 0.004) and by a not significant rise in the VO2 max (from 11.1 +/- 2.8 to 14 +/- 10 ml/kg/min; P=0.1). The quality of life, assessed by the Minnesota-Living-In-CHF score, improves from 49 +/- 20 to 35 +/- 22 after the six month follow-up (P=0.02) The echocardiogram also shows a better left ventricular ejection fraction at six months, from 24 +/- 7% to 31 +/- 7% (P<0.05). Based on a better NYHA functional class, responders (n=24; 71%) and non responders (n=10; 29%) were compared; a correlation between the functional class change and the improvement of the ejection fraction was documented, but not with the reduction in QRS width. Our registry, with the potential pitfalls of a monocentric prospective study, confirms the feasability, safety and efficacy of CRT in severe chrbnic heart failure uncompletely corrected pharmocalogically. It remains however approximately 30% of non responding patients, in whom the current clinical studies should help identify the right criteria to predict and discriminate responders.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
