Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Patient autonomy in physical restraint.

Pracy P Y Cheung1, Bernard M C Yam

  • 1Institute of Criminology, The University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Journal of Clinical Nursing
|April 12, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Physical restraints on older patients violate their autonomy and are morally unjustified. Respecting patient autonomy, especially for vulnerable older adults, is crucial for enhancing dignity and quality of life.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Professional doctorate and professional nursing practice.

Nurse education today·2005
Same author

From vocation to profession: the quest for professionalization of nursing.

British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)·2004
Same author

The Chinese version of the PSS:PICU.

Nursing research·2004
Same author

Comparison of the experiences of having a sick baby in a neonatal intensive care unit among mothers with and without the right of abode in Hong Kong.

Journal of clinical nursing·2003
Same author

Perceived stress and sense of coherence among critical care nurses in Hong Kong: a pilot study.

Journal of clinical nursing·2003
Same author

Life after cancer: adaptation issues faced by Chinese gynaecological cancer survivors in Hong Kong.

Psycho-oncology·2002

Area of Science:

  • Gerontology
  • Bioethics
  • Healthcare Policy

Background:

  • Physical restraints are commonly used on frail or confused older patients despite awareness initiatives.
  • The practice persists despite literature questioning its efficacy and highlighting patient welfare concerns.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the relationship between patient autonomy and the use of physical restraints.
  • To argue against the paternalistic use of restraints without informed consent.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review examining efficacy of physical restraints.
  • Ethical analysis of restraint use in relation to patient autonomy.

Main Results:

  • The use of physical restraints without informed consent is morally unjustified.
  • Restraint use unequivocally violates patient autonomy.

Conclusions:

  • The duty to respect autonomy must extend to older patients.
  • Respecting autonomy enhances human dignity and quality of life for older adults.

Related Experiment Videos