Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

7.0K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
7.0K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

11.4K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
11.4K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.0K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.0K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.8K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

9.8K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.8K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

7.6K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Identifying quality markers and improvement measures for ward-based surgical care: a semistructured interview study.

American journal of surgery·2015
Same author

Using preoperative imaging for intraoperative guidance: a case of mistaken identity.

The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS·2015
Same author

The quality narrative in health care.

Lancet (London, England)·2015
Same author

The endoscopy evolution: 'the superscope era'.

Frontline gastroenterology·2015
Same author

A wearable mobility assessment device for total knee replacement: A longitudinal feasibility study.

International journal of surgery (London, England)·2015
Same author

A national incident reporting and learning system in England and Wales, but at what cost?

Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research·2015
Same journal

Innovative management of Anterior Cutaneous Nerve Entrapment Syndrome (ACNES): A meta-analysis and introduction of a new robotic approach with patient-based algorithm.

American journal of surgery·2026
Same journal

Does the risk outweigh the benefit? Clot progression, recanalization & complications of anticoagulation therapy in acute pancreatitis with concomitant splanchnic vein thrombosis.

American journal of surgery·2026
Same journal

High and low body mass index and 90-day postoperative outcomes in patients with Crohn's disease undergoing abdominal surgery.

American journal of surgery·2026
Same journal

Women with firearm injuries: A multicenter mixed-methods study.

American journal of surgery·2026
Same journal

SBAS presidential address: A surgeon-scientist's journey from haptic science to digital performance metrics.

American journal of surgery·2026
Same journal

Using Dr. Google and AI to stay informed.

American journal of surgery·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 7, 2026

A Computerized Functional Skills Assessment and Training Program Targeting Technology Based Everyday Functional Skills
07:31

A Computerized Functional Skills Assessment and Training Program Targeting Technology Based Everyday Functional Skills

Published on: February 13, 2020

7.5K

Surgical skill is predicted by the ability to detect errors.

Simon Bann1, Mansoor Khan, Vivek Datta

  • 1Department of Surgical Oncology and Technology, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, 10th Floor QEQM Wing, St. Mary's Hospital, London W2 1NY, UK. s.bann@ic.ac.uk

American Journal of Surgery
|April 12, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The ability to detect surgical errors predicts technical skill in surgical training. This screening tool may help shorten the learning curve for surgeons, improving overall performance.

More Related Videos

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
08:05

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers

Published on: January 5, 2018

10.2K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 7, 2026

A Computerized Functional Skills Assessment and Training Program Targeting Technology Based Everyday Functional Skills
07:31

A Computerized Functional Skills Assessment and Training Program Targeting Technology Based Everyday Functional Skills

Published on: February 13, 2020

7.5K
A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
08:05

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers

Published on: January 5, 2018

10.2K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.2K

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Education
  • Medical Simulation
  • Performance Assessment

Background:

  • Objective surgical performance analysis enables surgeon comparison.
  • The Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) is effective but time-intensive.
  • A validated error detection screening tool was analyzed as a predictor of qualitative surgical performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the ability to detect surgical errors as a predictor of technical skill.
  • To assess the correlation between error identification and performance on simulated surgical tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Thirty-eight surgeons performed three exercises in a skills laboratory.
  • Two exercises involved bench-top surgical tasks scored using OSATS.
  • A third task assessed error identification in synthetic surgical models.

Main Results:

  • Interobserver reliability for video tasks was high (.9 and .91).
  • Error identification scores were 31 (27,34).
  • Significant correlations were found between error detection and performance (cystectomy r=.69, enterotomy r=.54).

Conclusions:

  • The capacity to identify surgical errors is a significant predictor of technical skill.
  • Further research is needed to determine if this method can shorten the surgical learning curve.