Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Validation of a flexible endoscopy simulator.

Joshua J Felsher1, Max Olesevich, Houssam Farres

  • 1Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA.

American Journal of Surgery
|April 12, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Is Coeliac Revascularisation Still Required After Median Arcuate Ligament Release? Two Decades of Institutional Experience and Changing Trends.

European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery·2026
Same author

Twenty-Five Years of Management of Popliteal Venous Aneurysms.

European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery·2026
Same author

Hybrid Lower Extremity Revascularization Avoiding Groin Re-Exploration in a Morbidly Obese Patient With Acute Limb Ischemia After Failed Femoral-Popliteal PTFE Bypass: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Vascular and endovascular surgery·2026
Same author

Reply to Editorial Comment on "High Abdominal Aortic Calcium Scores are Associated with Renal Function Decline Following Radical Nephrectomy".

Urology·2026
Same author

Shared Decision-Making in Vascular Surgery: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.

Annals of vascular surgery·2026
Same author

Birth Trauma and Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: Preliminary Evidence.

Annals of vascular surgery·2026

The GI Mentor virtual reality simulator effectively distinguishes between experienced and beginner endoscopists, showing significant performance differences in colonoscopy simulations. This VR tool demonstrates validity for assessing varying levels of endoscopic skill.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Simulation
  • Surgical Education Technology
  • Gastroenterology Training

Background:

  • Virtual reality (VR) simulation is increasingly used in surgical training.
  • The validity of VR simulators for assessing physician skills requires determination.
  • This study evaluates the GI Mentor VR system for distinguishing endoscopist experience levels.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if the GI Mentor flexible endoscopy simulator can differentiate between experienced and novice endoscopists.
  • To assess the construct validity of a VR colonoscopy simulator.

Main Methods:

  • 75 physicians (attendings, fellows, residents) were divided into experienced and beginner groups based on training and experience.
  • Participants completed 2 standardized colonoscopic simulations using the GI Mentor VR system.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Performance was objectively measured by time to cecum, mucosa visualization, polypectomy rate, view clarity, and patient discomfort.

    • Main Results:

    • Experienced endoscopists were significantly more efficient and had higher polypectomy rates than beginners.
    • Experienced physicians visualized more colonic surface and maintained clearer lumen views.
    • Beginners took longer to reach the cecum in the second simulation.

    Conclusions:

    • The GI Mentor VR colonoscopy simulator is a valid tool for distinguishing between endoscopists with varying experience levels.
    • Significant performance differences were observed, supporting its utility in training and assessment.
    • Further validation is needed to explore its full potential for qualification and certification.