Noticeable, troublesome and objectionable limits of blur
David A Atchison1, Scott W Fisher, Carol A Pedersen
1School of Optometry, Queensland University of Technology, Victoria Park Road, Kelvin Grove, QLD 4059, Australia. d.atchison@qut.edu.au
Abstract:
We investigated limits at which induced blur becomes noticeable, troublesome and objectionable. We used 15 cyclopleged subjects, a Badal optometer with lines of three high contrast letters as targets, 3-6 mm artificial pupils, and 0.0-0.7 logMAR letter sizes. For 0.0 logMAR size, mean "noticeable" blur limits were +/-0.33D, +/-0.30D and +/-0.28D at 3 mm, 4 mm and 6 mm, respectively, but increased by about 70% for 0.7 logMAR letters. All limits reduced by about 17% as pupil size increased from 3 mm to 6 mm. Letter size had a significant influence on all blur limits (1.6-2.1 times), but blur direction had no significant effect. Magnitudes of "troublesome" and 'objectionable" limits were 1.6-1.8 times and 2.1-2.5 times relative to "noticeable" limits, respectively. Our results suggest criteria for troublesome and objectionable blur are relatively unaffected by letter size.
Related Concept Videos
Focusing of Light in the Eye
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Types of Limits II
Limits with Oscillating Discontinuities
Interference and Diffraction
Imaging Biological Samples with Optical Microscopy
In optical microscopy, the specimen to be viewed is placed on a glass slide and clipped on the stage...

