Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Defining amblyopia: the need for a joint classification.

Josefin Ohlsson1

  • 1Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Göteborg University, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden. josefin.ohlsson@neuro.gu.se

Strabismus
|April 13, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Normal visual acuity in 17--18 year olds.

Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica·2005
Same author

Longterm refractive and visual outcomes in subjects with high hyperopia.

Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica·2004
Same author

Clinical evaluation of an eccentric infrared photorefractor: the PowerRefractor.

Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica·2003
Same author

[Do not treat interns-researchers unfairly!].

Lakartidningen·2003
Same author

Prevalence of myopia among 12- to 13-year-old schoolchildren in northern Mexico.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·2003
Same author

Visual acuity, amblyopia, and ocular pathology in 12- to 13-year-old children in Northern Mexico.

Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus·2003
Same journal

Motor and sensory outcomes after botulinum toxin A injection versus unilateral medial rectus recession in small-to-moderate angle esotropia.

Strabismus·2026
Same journal

Bimedial rectus recession versus botulinum toxin injection for the treatment of infantile esotropia.

Strabismus·2026
Same journal

Worsening abducens paresis and chronic orbital venous congestion after carotid-cavernous fistula embolization: long-term motility outcomes.

Strabismus·2026
Same journal

Strabismus following Endonasal sinus surgery: a 10-year retrospective analysis of clinical profile and outcomes.

Strabismus·2026
Same journal

Correction.

Strabismus·2026
Same journal

Surgical management of iatrogenic medial rectus transection following functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a report of two cases.

Strabismus·2026
See all related articles

Amblyopia research is growing, but inconsistent definitions hinder progress. A unified definition is needed for visual acuity reduction, interocular differences, and amblyogenic factors in amblyopia diagnosis.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Vision Science
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • High-quality research on amblyopia has significantly increased recently.
  • Current research is hampered by a lack of a standardized definition for amblyopia.
  • Inconsistent definitions across studies complicate the interpretation and comparison of findings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the need for a universally accepted definition of amblyopia.
  • To identify key aspects requiring consensus in defining amblyopia.
  • To encourage global collaboration among vision scientists for a unified definition.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current research trends and definitions of amblyopia.
  • Analysis of critical factors influencing amblyopia diagnosis.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of the implications of definitional variability.
  • Main Results:

    • Multiple factors contribute to the ambiguity in defining amblyopia, including visual acuity reduction, interocular acuity differences, testing methodologies, refractive adaptation, presence of amblyogenic factors, absence of organic causes, and treatability.
    • The lack of a consistent definition impacts research reproducibility and clinical practice.

    Conclusions:

    • A consensus on the definition of amblyopia is urgently required.
    • Collaborative efforts among vision scientists are essential to establish a clear and consistent definition.
    • Standardizing the definition will advance research, improve diagnosis, and enhance treatment strategies for amblyopia.