Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Why we need confidence intervals.

Douglas G Altman1

  • 1NHS/Cancer Research UK Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK. doug.altman@cancer.org.uk

World Journal of Surgery
|April 14, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Population attributable fraction.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2018
Same author

Reporting guidelines for oncology research: helping to maximise the impact of your research.

British journal of cancer·2018
Same author

Updating standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy: the development of STARD 2015.

Research integrity and peer review·2018
Same author

Do declarative titles affect readers' perceptions of research findings? A randomized trial.

Research integrity and peer review·2018
Same author

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: An updated systematic review and involvement of low and middle income countries.

PloS one·2018
Same author

The INTERGROWTH-21<sup>st</sup> fetal growth standards: toward the global integration of pregnancy and pediatric care.

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·2018
Same journal

The Safety of In-Hospital Delay and the Utility of dNLR in Elderly Patients With Acute Appendicitis.

World journal of surgery·2026
Same journal

Feasibility of Post-Operative Telehealth for Pediatric Surgical Patients in Malawi-A Mixed Methods Analysis.

World journal of surgery·2026
Same journal

Surgical Infrastructure and Workforce Readiness in Rwanda's District and Level 2 Teaching Hospitals: A Nationwide Facility-Based Survey.

World journal of surgery·2026
Same journal

From General Preparedness to Injury-Pattern-Specific Trauma Resource Planning.

World journal of surgery·2026
Same journal

Prevalence and Outcomes of Thrombocytopenia at ICU Admission Among Critically Ill Patients in a Resource-Limited Setting.

World journal of surgery·2026
Same journal

Transition of Care From Pediatric to Adult Services for Patients With Anorectal Malformations: A Qualitative Study.

World journal of surgery·2026
See all related articles

Statistical analysis using confidence intervals (CIs) provides more informative results than p-values alone. This approach quantifies effects and their uncertainty, aiding interpretation, especially in small studies.

Area of Science:

  • Statistical analysis
  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical research methodology

Background:

  • Traditional statistical analysis often relies on p-values, which can be insufficient for interpreting study results.
  • Estimating effects with confidence intervals (CIs) offers a more comprehensive understanding of clinical relevance and uncertainty.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explain the principles of confidence intervals (CIs) in statistical analysis.
  • To highlight the advantages of CIs over p-values for interpreting study findings.
  • To discuss the appropriate use and common misinterpretations of CIs.

Main Methods:

  • Focuses on the conceptual understanding of CIs, rather than complex mathematical derivations.
  • Illustrates how CIs can be applied across various statistical analyses.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Emphasizes the interpretation of CIs in the context of clinical significance.

    • Main Results:

    • Results expressed as estimates with CIs are more informative than p-values.
    • CIs effectively quantify the uncertainty surrounding an estimate.
    • CIs are particularly valuable for interpreting non-significant findings in small studies, preventing misinterpretation.

    Conclusions:

    • Confidence intervals should be routinely reported for key results in clinical trials and observational studies.
    • Adopting an estimation approach with CIs enhances the clarity and clinical utility of research findings.
    • Proper interpretation of CIs is crucial for accurate scientific communication.