Related Experiment Videos
Restricted maximum likelihood estimation of additive genetic variance when selected base animals are considered fixed
1Department of Animal Breeding, Wageningen Agricultural University, The Netherlands.
Journal of Animal Science
|April 1, 1992
Summary
Estimating genetic parameters using a model with fixed base animals can introduce bias, especially when descendants are selected. Adjusting for selected base animals is crucial for accurate genetic variance estimation in animal breeding.
Area of Science:
- Animal Breeding and Genetics
- Quantitative Genetics
- Statistical Genetics
Background:
- Accurate estimation of genetic parameters is vital for effective animal breeding programs.
- Traditional models may not adequately account for selection in base populations, potentially biasing results.
- Understanding the impact of base animal selection on genetic variance estimation is essential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate a method for estimating genetic parameters using a model that treats selected base animals as fixed.
- To evaluate the bias introduced by assuming base animals as fixed versus random in genetic variance estimation.
- To assess the impact of selection on descendants of fixed base animals.
Main Methods:
- A simulation study was conducted with five generations of selection.
- Genetic variance was estimated using a model where base animals were treated as fixed and compared to a random model.
- Performance records were available for Generations 4 and 5.
- The Mendelian sampling of gametes from base parents was considered.
Main Results:
- Estimated genetic variance was lower when base animals were assumed fixed (6.03) compared to random (8.58), with simulated values of 10.
- Residual variance was overestimated when base animals were assumed fixed.
- Bias was introduced when descendants of fixed base animals were selected, but not by the selection of base animals themselves.
- Real-world dairy data showed up to 8% differences in genetic variance estimation after accounting for selected base animals.
Conclusions:
- A model assuming fixed base animals can provide unbiased estimates of genetic parameters if selection in descendants is properly handled.
- Overestimation of residual variance occurs when base animals are fixed and their descendants are selected.
- Adjusting for selected base animals in genetic parameter estimation, particularly in dairy cattle, can significantly improve accuracy.