Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

Rat Model of the Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (ALPPS) Procedure
Published on: August 14, 2017
Risk-adjustment in hepatobiliary pancreatic surgery
Hemant M Kocher1, Paris P Tekkis, Palepu Gopal
1Academic Department of Surgery, King's College Hospital, London, UK. hemant.kocher@cancer.org.uk
The POSSUM score effectively predicts complications in hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) surgery, outperforming other scoring systems. This aids in patient risk stratification and resource allocation for better surgical outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Surgical Oncology
- Gastroenterology
- Critical Care Medicine
Background:
- Accurate risk stratification is crucial for patients undergoing complex hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) surgery.
- Existing scoring systems (POSSUM, ASA, APACHE, Childs) have varying performance in predicting outcomes for HPB procedures.
- Understanding the limitations and advantages of these tools is essential for clinical decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the predictive performance of POSSUM, American Society of Anesthetists (ASA), APACHE, and Childs classification for mortality and morbidity in HPB surgery.
- To identify the most effective risk stratification tools for HPB surgery patients.
- To highlight the advantages and limitations of different risk assessment models in this surgical context.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 177 patients undergoing elective complex HPB surgery.
- Inclusion of 71 pre-operative and intra-operative risk factors.
- Utilized ordered logistic regression to identify predictors of in-hospital mortality and morbidity.
Main Results:
- Operative mortality was 3.95%, closely matching predicted rates from p-POSSUM (4.31%) and APACHE (4.29%).
- Post-operative complications occurred in 45% of patients, with 13.6% experiencing major adverse events.
- The pre-operative POSSUM physiological score demonstrated superior prediction of complications compared to ASA, APACHE, and Childs classifications (P=0.009 vs. P=0.108, P=0.117, P=0.136 respectively).
- Independent risk factors included serum sodium, creatinine, international normalized ratio (INR), pulse rate, and intra-operative blood loss.
- A combination of POSSUM variables and INR provided optimal risk prognostication.
Conclusions:
- Morbidity in elective HPB surgery can be accurately predicted using validated scoring systems.
- These predictions can enhance informed consent processes for patients.
- Effective risk stratification facilitates better allocation of intensive and high-dependency care resources.
More Related Videos
07:48Intraoperative Video Consultation Following Bile Duct Transection Facilitates Direct OR Transfer for Robotic Hepaticojejunostomy at Tertiary Center
Published on: January 9, 2026
05:22Intraoperative Strategy under Complex Vascular Adhesion for Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Bismuth-Corlette Type IIIb Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma
Published on: February 13, 2026