Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Who owns the data?

Gregory A Petsko1

  • 1Rosenstiel Basic Medical Sciences Research Center, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02454-9110, USA. petsko@brandeis.edu

Genome Biology
|April 19, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Publicly funded research should be freely accessible. This movement advocates for open access, ensuring taxpayer-funded scientific discoveries benefit everyone without paywalls.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The evolving landscape of protein structure and molecular recognition.

Trends in biochemical sciences·2026
Same author

RhoGEF12 regulates endosomal SORL1-retromer and its inhibition is therapeutic in human neuronal models of Alzheimer's disease.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

The <i>SORL1</i> p.Y1816C variant causes impaired endosomal dimerization and autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2024
Same author

RIOK2 transcriptionally regulates TRiC and dyskerin complexes to prevent telomere shortening.

Nature communications·2024
Same author

Author Correction: CEACAM1 regulates TIM-3-mediated tolerance and exhaustion.

Nature·2024
Same author

On the causal role of retromer-dependent endosomal recycling in Alzheimer's disease.

Nature cell biology·2023
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Area of Science:

  • Bibliometrics
  • Scholarly Communication

Background:

  • The traditional subscription model for scientific journals presents a barrier to accessing publicly funded research.
  • Concerns have been raised about the fairness and efficiency of paywalls for research supported by public funds.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the historical development and impact of the open access movement.
  • To evaluate arguments for and against immediate open access to publicly funded research.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of scholarly communication policies and trends.
  • Analysis of the economic and societal implications of subscription-based versus open access models.
  • Case studies of institutions and funding bodies advocating for open access.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • The open access movement has gained significant traction over the past decade, influencing research dissemination policies.
  • Evidence suggests open access can increase research visibility and impact.
  • Debates continue regarding sustainable funding models for open access publishing.

Conclusions:

  • Transitioning publicly funded research to open access is a critical step towards equitable knowledge sharing.
  • Addressing the financial and logistical challenges of open access is essential for its widespread adoption.
  • Continued advocacy and policy development are needed to ensure research accessibility.