Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Compared to what? Finding controls for case-control studies.

David A Grimes1, Kenneth F Schulz

  • 1Family Health International, PO Box 13950, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA. dgrimes@fhi.org

Lancet (London, England)
|April 20, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Smartphone-derived digital motor measures to monitor progression in idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder.

NPJ Parkinson's disease·2026
Same author

SPIRIT 2025 statement: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same author

Biomarkers.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2025
Same author

Cognitive profiles at presentation and subsequent cognitive decline and quality of life in Parkinson's disease.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2025
Same author

The relation of eye movements to the occurrence of freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease.

Brain communications·2025
Same author

Association between vascular risk factors burden and neurodegenerative diseases: results from ONDRI.

Journal of neurology·2025
Same journal

Metabolic traits in obesity and normal BMI in industrialised countries: a multi-country analysis of national population-based studies.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Safety and efficacy of mRNA vaccines: a mechanistic and public health perspective.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Efficacy and safety of tirofiban after successful endovascular reperfusion in acute ischaemic stroke (ATTRACTION) in China: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
See all related articles

Selecting appropriate control groups is crucial in case-control studies. Careful selection ensures accurate exposure frequency estimation and prevents misleading research results, safeguarding against potential medical harm.

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Control groups are essential for estimating exposure frequency in case-control studies.
  • Controls can be sourced from known populations (e.g., cruise ship passengers) or unknown populations (e.g., emergency department patients).
  • Techniques like random-digit dialling can be used when population rosters are unavailable.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To elucidate the critical role and selection methods of control groups in epidemiological research.
  • To highlight the implications of control group selection on study validity and patient safety.

Main Methods:

  • Discusses the use of controls from known populations (e.g., sampling from a defined roster).
  • Explains methods for selecting controls from unknown populations, including hospital, neighborhood, and social network controls.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Addresses strategies for optimizing control group size and selection ratios, particularly in studies with few cases.

    • Main Results:

    • Emphasizes that one well-selected control group is generally superior to multiple poorly chosen ones.
    • Suggests increasing the control-to-case ratio can enhance the power to detect significant differences when cases are few.
    • Highlights that no control group is perfect, stressing the importance of representativeness.

    Conclusions:

    • The representativeness of control groups is paramount for accurate study findings.
    • Inappropriate control selection can lead to erroneous conclusions and potential patient harm.
    • Researchers must critically evaluate control group selection for study validity and safety.