Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Separating non-isthmus- from isthmus-dependent atrial flutter using wavefront variability.

Sanjiv M Narayan1, Alborz Hassankhani, Gregory K Feld

  • 1University of California and Veterans Administration Medical Centers, San Diego, California 92161, USA. snarayan@ucsd.edu

Journal of the American College of Cardiology
|April 20, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Identifying the Presence and Characteristics of Mid-Myocardial and Epicardial Fibrosis From Intracardiac Electrograms in Patients Undergoing Ventricular Arrhythmia Ablation Using a Transformer-Based Self-Supervised Classifier.

Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology·2026
Same author

Antithetic Sampling Enhanced Probabilistic Diffusion for Denoising Cardiac Time Series.

IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics·2026
Same author

Electrophysiologically-informed digital twins for atrial fibrillation.

Medical image analysis·2026
Same author

Detecting and Mitigating Bias for Inclusive and Trustworthy Clinical Research: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine·2026
Same author

Artificial-intelligence electrocardiography and computed tomography mapping to guide surgical ablation of ventricular arrhythmias.

JTCVS open·2026
Same author

Ultrasound-guided parasternal tunneling during intermuscular subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation is associated with lower shock impedance and more favorable implant geometry.

Heart rhythm·2026

A novel electrocardiogram (ECG) algorithm detects greater atrial wavefront variability in non-isthmus-dependent atrial flutter (NIDAFL) compared to isthmus-dependent atrial flutter (IDAFL), enabling accurate differentiation for improved ablation guidance.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Electrophysiology
  • Medical Diagnostics

Background:

  • Distinguishing between isthmus-dependent atrial flutter (IDAFL) and non-isthmus-dependent atrial flutter (NIDAFL) using standard electrocardiogram (ECG) F-wave analysis is suboptimal.
  • Anatomical and functional differences between IDAFL and NIDAFL may lead to varying wavefront propagation patterns, a hypothesis tested in this study.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a novel ECG algorithm for differentiating IDAFL from NIDAFL based on functional wavefront characteristics.
  • To assess the utility of ECG-derived temporospatial loop analysis in distinguishing between these two forms of atrial flutter.

Main Methods:

  • Sixty-two patients (39 IDAFL, 23 NIDAFL) undergoing atrial flutter ablation had their ECGs analyzed using a novel algorithm representing atrial wavefronts as temporospatial loops.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The algorithm correlated F-wave templates over time, with loop characteristics analyzed for temporal and spatial regularity.
  • ECG findings were validated against intracardiac electrogram measurements of temporal and spatial variability.

    • Main Results:

    • Atrial ECG temporospatial loops demonstrated significantly greater variability in NIDAFL compared to IDAFL (p < 0.01).
    • The algorithm accurately classified 39 of 39 IDAFL cases and 22 of 23 NIDAFL cases.
    • Intracardiac mapping confirmed greater temporal and spatial variability in NIDAFL versus IDAFL.

    Conclusions:

    • Increased cycle-to-cycle atrial wavefront variability, detectable via ECG temporospatial analysis, effectively distinguishes NIDAFL from IDAFL.
    • These findings have significant implications for guiding atrial flutter ablation strategies.
    • The results support a spectrum model for intracardiac organization in IDAFL and NIDAFL.