Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Validating three-dimensional imaging of the breast.

Albert Losken1, Hisham Seify, Donald D Denson

  • 1Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30308, USA. Albert_Losken@emoryhealthcare.org

Annals of Plastic Surgery
|April 20, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Risk of Recall Among Plastic Surgery Devices Cleared Through the FDA 510(k) Pathway.

Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum·2026
Same author

Preoperative and Intraoperative Predictors of Prolonged Length of Stay in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Stratified Analysis Using 2011-2023 ACS-NSQIP Datasets.

The Journal of surgical research·2026
Same author

Gaps in Nutrition and Exercise Counseling Preparedness among Plastic Surgery Trainees: A Nationwide Exploratory Survey Study.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open·2026
Same author

A novel, survey-based validated grading system for implant rippling in breast reconstruction.

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS·2026
Same author

Plastic surgery workforce distribution: A national analysis.

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS·2026
Same author

The Impact of BMI on Postoperative Complications Following Reduction Mammaplasty.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026

Three-dimensional (3D) breast imaging offers accurate and reproducible measurements for volume and surface distances. This technology aids in objective breast assessments, particularly for longitudinal studies.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Surgical Oncology

Background:

  • Accurate breast measurements are crucial for qualitative assessment of shape, size, and contour.
  • The validity of measurements derived from 3D imaging requires rigorous determination before clinical application.
  • 3D imaging holds significant potential for improving breast analysis and patient evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To validate the accuracy and reliability of breast volume calculations using 3D imaging compared to intraoperative water displacement.
  • To assess the precision of surface measurements, specifically nipple-to-notch distance, derived from 3D breast images.
  • To establish the inter- and intrarater reliability of measurements obtained from 3D breast imaging.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Part I: 3D images of 19 premastectomy breasts were analyzed by two raters to calculate volume, compared against water displacement measurements.
  • Inter- and intrarater reliability for volume calculations were assessed.
  • Part II: Surface distances (nipple to notch) on 20 breasts were measured using 3D imaging and compared to known distances.

    • Main Results:

    • Breast volume calculations from 3D images showed a mean relative difference of approximately -2% compared to intraoperative measurements, with excellent inter- and intrarater reliability (0.80-0.975).
    • Surface measurements (nipple to notch) had a mean relative difference of about -6% with high agreement between raters (0.975).
    • Volume measurements exhibited greater variability than surface measurements, and both tended to be underestimated.

    Conclusions:

    • Three-dimensional (3D) imaging technology provides consistent and reproducible accuracy for objective breast volume and surface measurements.
    • While measurements may be slightly underestimated and volume calculations show more variability, 3D imaging offers invaluable data for longitudinal breast assessment.
    • 3D imaging enhances the ability to objectively evaluate breast shape, size, and contour, supporting clinical decision-making and outcome analysis.