Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

Generation of Prostate Cancer Cell Models of Resistance to the Anti-mitotic Agent Docetaxel
Published on: September 8, 2017
Phase-I dose escalation and sequencing study of docetaxel and continuous infusion topotecan in patients with advanced
James A Posey1, Hui Wang, Joelle Hamilton
1Department of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 263 Wallace Tumor Institute, 1530 3rd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, USA. james.posey@ccc.uab.edu
Purpose:
Anti-tumor activity can often be enhanced with combination therapy in managing patients with metastatic cancer. However, dose sequence and schedule of delivery can alter the pharmacokinetics, toxicity, and anti-tumor response. Therefore, attention to drug-drug interactions which may be sequence or schedule-dependent are necessary. Docetaxel and topotecan are non-cross-resistance cytotoxic agents with activity in a variety of malignancies. The goal of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of docetaxel and continuous infusion topotecan using two sequences of administration.
Experimental Design:
Patients were randomized to schedule A or B and enrolled in four escalating-dose cohorts. On schedule A, docetaxel was administered over 1 h and followed by topotecan administered over 72 h. On schedule B, topotecan was given as a 72 h continuous infusion followed by a 1 h infusion of docetaxel. While the doses for the docetaxel and topotecan were the same for schedule A and schedule B, the toxicities, and thus the determination of maximum tolerated dose (MTD), were assessed independently. The plasma pharmacokinetic disposition of topotecan and docetaxel were evaluated during the first cycle of each sequence to assess drug interactions.
Results:
Thirty patients, 20 males and 10 females were evaluable for toxicity and response. Four patients were chemonaive. Mean number cycles given were 3. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were comparable on both schedules, as was the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) for both schedules. There were no apparent differences in absolute neutrophil count or platelet nadirs between schedules A and B for three of the four cohorts. The principal non-hematologic toxicity was nausea and vomiting. The time of overlap of topotecan lactone or total concentrations and docetaxel concentrations were greater on schedule A as compared with schedule B and was associated with reduced clearance of docetaxel on schedule A as compared to schedule B. However, the mean clearance for docetaxel (18 for all 16 L h(-1) m(-2) and 29 for all 28 L h(-1) m(-2) on schedules A and B, respectively, and topotecan 16 for all 10 L h(-1) m(-2) and 7 for all 6 L h(-1) m(-2) on schedules A and B, respectively) were not statistically different (P > 0.05).
Conclusions:
The observed toxicity was not sequence-dependent, despite the observed change in kinetics. Docetaxel and topotecan can be administered with acceptable toxicity at the recommended phase-II dose of docetaxel 60 mg m(-2) and topotecan 0.85 mg m(-2) day(-1)x3 days.
More Related Videos
15:04Potentiation of Anticancer Antibody Efficacy by Antineoplastic Drugs: Detection of Antibody-drug Synergism Using the Combination Index Equation
Published on: January 19, 2019
10:27Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020