Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

Analysis of the Ambient Particulate Matter-induced Chromosomal Aberrations Using an In Vitro System
Published on: December 21, 2016
Risk of five polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in a terrestrial environment: influence of data variability
Patrik Fauser1, Marianne Thomsen, Janeck Scott-Fordsmand
1National Environmental Research Institute, Department of Policy Analysis, Frederiksborgvej 399, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark. paf@dmu.dk
Abstract:
The risk of five different pyrogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) toward two soil-dwelling organisms (i.e., springtail [Folsomia fimetaria] and earthworm [Eisenia veneta]) has been investigated with respect to lethality and reproduction at two soil depths in a typical Danish soil. Predicted environmental concentrations (PECs) are calculated with a model describing diffusion, bulk flow, and microbial degradation. Predicted no-effect concentrations (PNECs) are derived from laboratory experiments performed with nominal soil concentrations in the range from 0 to 300 microg PAH/g dry weight. Risk is estimated through a stochastic approach as well as with the conventional point estimate. The point estimate predicts a potential risk for pyrene, log PEC/PNEC = -0.01, with respect to springtail reproduction at 5 cm soil depth. In all other scenarios, the point-estimate log-ratios are significantly lower than 0. For the stochastic approach risk is defined when the probability for risk (i.e., the probability for log PEC/PNEC > 0), is larger than 5%. The results show that risk is present only for springtail and in the following five scenarios: For anthracene, the probability for risk with respect to lethality is 12% at 5 cm soil depth, and 17 and 5% with respect to reproduction at 5 and 50 cm soil depth, respectively; for pyrene the probability for risk with respect to reproduction is 49 and 14% at 5 and 50 cm, respectively. The results show that risk cannot be defined unambiguously with the two approaches. The probabilistic approach is less restrictive, and even small probabilities may be used as early-warning indications that risk may be posed under unfavorable circumstances.
More Related Videos
09:33Visualizing Field Data Collection Procedures of Exposure and Biomarker Assessments for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial in India
Published on: December 23, 2022
12:15Quantification of three DNA Lesions by Mass Spectrometry and Assessment of Their Levels in Tissues of Mice Exposed to Ambient Fine Particulate Matter
Published on: May 29, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Five-Membered Heterocyclic Aromatic Compounds: Overview
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
Toxicity Testing in Animals
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...