Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

Prehospital Thrombolysis: A Manual from Berlin
Published on: November 27, 2013
Is primary angioplasty more effective than prehospital fibrinolysis in diabetics with acute myocardial infarction?
Eric Bonnefoy1, Philippe Gabriel Steg, Sylvie Chabaud
1Service de Cardiologie, Hôpital Cardio-Vasculaire et Pneumologique Louis Pradel, BP Lyon-Montchat, 69394 Lyon Cedex 03, France. eric.bonnefoy@hcuge.ch
Diabetic patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) face higher risks. Primary angioplasty may offer better outcomes than prehospital fibrinolysis for this group.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Diabetology
Background:
- The CAPTIM study compared primary angioplasty versus prehospital fibrinolysis for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) within 6 hours.
- Initial findings showed similar 30-day outcomes for the primary endpoint (death, recurrent MI, stroke) between the two strategies.
- This analysis focuses on the outcomes within the diabetic subgroup of the CAPTIM study.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the treatment outcomes of diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) based on reperfusion strategy.
- To compare the effectiveness of primary angioplasty versus prehospital fibrinolysis in diabetic patients presenting with STEMI.
Main Methods:
- Subgroup analysis of the CAPTIM study, comparing diabetic (n=103) and non-diabetic (n=731) patients.
- Patients were randomized to either primary angioplasty or prehospital fibrinolysis (recombinant tissue plasminogen activator, rt-PA).
- Outcomes analyzed included the primary endpoint (death, recurrent MI, stroke) and mortality at 30 days, as well as rates of rescue angioplasty.
Main Results:
- Diabetic patients exhibited a higher baseline risk profile and significantly higher rates of the primary endpoint (14.6% vs. 5.6%, P=0.002) and mortality (8.7% vs. 3.1%, P=0.01) at 30 days compared to non-diabetics.
- In diabetics, prehospital fibrinolysis was associated with a trend towards a higher incidence of the primary endpoint (21.7% vs. 8.8%, P=0.09) and mortality (13.0% vs. 5.3%, P=0.29) compared to primary angioplasty.
- Diabetics had a higher rate of rescue angioplasty (41.4% vs. 23.5%, P=0.01) and significantly higher mortality after rescue angioplasty (17.4% vs. 0%, P=0.001).
Conclusions:
- Diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction may benefit more from a primary angioplasty strategy.
- The observed trends suggest potential harm from prehospital fibrinolysis in this subgroup.
- Further dedicated studies are needed to confirm these findings due to the limited sample size of the diabetic subgroup.
More Related Videos
05:26Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Angina IV: Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care