Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Cesarean section upon request: is it appropriate for everybody?

Assaf Ben-Meir1, Joseph G Schenker, Yossef Ezra

  • 1Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Hadasaah Hebrew University Medical Center, Ein-Kerem, Jerusalem, Israel.

Journal of Perinatal Medicine
|April 22, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Elective cesarean delivery and vaginal birth appear equally safe, but a trial of labor carries risks. For women desiring multiple children, repeated vaginal deliveries are generally recommended over cesarean sections.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Subsequent Pregnancies After Conservative Placenta Accreta Management: Recurrent Accreta and Preserved Fertility, a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026
Same author

John J. Sciarra: a life spent to foster women's health and rights.

Gynecological endocrinology : the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology·2025
Same author

John J. Sciarra: a life spent to foster women's health and rights.

Gynecological endocrinology : the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology·2025
Same author

Re-Evaluating the Contraction Stress Test for Term Fetal Growth Restriction Fetuses: A Retrospective Study.

Journal of clinical medicine·2025
Same author

Polycystic ovary syndrome and morphokinetic embryonic development: a case-control study evaluating 791 embryos.

F&S science·2025
Same author

The Effect of Maternal Parity on Preterm Birth Risk in Women with Short Mid-Trimester Cervical Length: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Journal of clinical medicine·2024
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • Reproductive Health

Background:

  • Cesarean section requests without medical necessity present ethical and clinical challenges for obstetricians.
  • Current research often compares elective cesarean delivery with vaginal delivery, finding similar safety profiles.
  • A gap exists in comparing elective cesarean section with a trial of labor, which can lead to assisted vaginal delivery or intrapartum cesarean section, both associated with higher maternal and neonatal morbidity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the risk-benefit balance of elective cesarean section versus vaginal delivery, considering patient autonomy and future pregnancy complications.
  • To evaluate the long-term implications of cesarean delivery on maternal health, particularly concerning future pregnancies and pelvic floor function.
  • To provide guidance for obstetricians navigating patient requests for non-medically indicated cesarean sections.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of existing literature on vaginal delivery, elective cesarean section, and trial of labor outcomes.
  • Review of data on maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality associated with different delivery modes.
  • Assessment of long-term maternal health risks, including complications in subsequent pregnancies and pelvic floor integrity.

Main Results:

  • Elective cesarean section and vaginal delivery are often considered equally safe in the short term.
  • A trial of labor may increase risks of assisted vaginal delivery or intrapartum cesarean section, elevating maternal and neonatal complications.
  • Cesarean section does not offer long-term pelvic floor protection after three procedures and shows similar rates of urinary incontinence compared to three vaginal deliveries.

Conclusions:

  • The decision for elective cesarean section should weigh patient autonomy against potential risks, including future pregnancy complications like placental issues and increased morbidity from repeat cesareans.
  • For women desiring multiple children, especially in contexts where numerous pregnancies are common, repeated spontaneous vaginal deliveries present a more favorable risk-benefit profile.
  • Obstetricians must counsel patients comprehensively on the risks and benefits of all delivery options, considering individual circumstances and long-term maternal health outcomes.