Related Experiment Videos
Proposal to adapt the Workplace Analysis Scheme for Proficiency (WASP) programme to fibre counting tests
M Grzebyk1, E Kauffer, L Fréville
1Institut National de Recherche et de Sécurité, Avenue de Bourgogne, BP27, 5450L Vanoeuvre lès Nancy, France. michel.grzebyk@inrs.fr
The Annals of Occupational Hygiene
|April 23, 2005
Summary
A modified Workplace Analysis Scheme for Proficiency (WASP) method for fibre counting proficiency tests showed comparable results to established French and British methods. This new approach offers a robust way to classify laboratory performance in fibre analysis.
Area of Science:
- Occupational Health
- Analytical Chemistry
- Environmental Science
Background:
- Proficiency testing is crucial for ensuring laboratory accuracy in fibre counting.
- Existing methods for classifying laboratories in fibre counting proficiency tests include French and British approaches.
- A need exists for robust and comparable methods for laboratory performance evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare three distinct methods for classifying laboratories participating in fibre counting proficiency tests.
- To evaluate the effectiveness and selectivity of a modified Workplace Analysis Scheme for Proficiency (WASP) program adapted for fibre counting.
- To assess the comparability of the modified WASP method against established French and British classification systems.
Main Methods:
- Comparison of French (mean and coefficient of variation) and British (normalized results within limits) classification methods.
- Adaptation and application of a modified Workplace Analysis Scheme for Proficiency (WASP) program for fibre counting.
- Laboratory classification based on comparing individual laboratory result variance with a reference variance (experienced analysts/laboratories).
Main Results:
- The modified WASP method yielded results comparable to the French and British classification methods.
- The modified WASP approach allows for the comparison of different variance magnitudes, enhancing analytical flexibility.
- The selectivity of all three evaluated methods was assessed.
Conclusions:
- The modified WASP method provides a viable and comparable alternative for laboratory classification in fibre counting proficiency testing.
- This method offers advantages in comparing variances, facilitating a more nuanced evaluation of laboratory performance.
- Further evaluation of method selectivity confirms the utility of the modified WASP approach.