Clinical service organisation for heart failure
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

Workflow and Framework for Collecting and Implementing Point-of-Care Ultrasound Data in the Management of Heart Failure Patients
Published on: July 12, 2024
S Taylor1, J Bestall, S Cotter
1Centre for General Practice and Primary Care, St Bartholomew's and The Royal London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Mile End Road, London, UK, E1 4NS. s.j.c.taylor@qmul.ac.uk
Insights
Disease management interventions for chronic heart failure (CHF) show potential, particularly case management, which may reduce mortality in high-quality studies. Further research is needed to confirm effectiveness and explore patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Chronic heart failure (CHF) is a prevalent condition leading to frequent hospitalizations.
- Various clinical service organization interventions aim to manage CHF patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of disease management interventions for patients with CHF.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CHF disease management interventions to usual care.
- Searched multiple databases (Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, etc.) up to July 2003.
- Data extraction and quality assessment performed independently by at least two reviewers.
Main Results:
- Sixteen trials involving 1,627 patients were included, categorized into multidisciplinary, case management, and clinic interventions.
- Case management interventions showed a trend towards reduced all-cause mortality, significant in higher-quality studies (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.46-0.98).
- Weak evidence suggested case management may reduce heart failure admissions; multidisciplinary interventions showed short-term reduction in heart failure re-admissions. Clinic interventions lacked strong supporting evidence.
Conclusions:
- Current data are insufficient to make definitive recommendations for CHF disease management interventions.
- Further adequately powered, multi-center studies are required.
- Future research should assess intervention impact on quality of life, patient/carer satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness.
Background:
Chronic heart failure (CHF) is a serious, common condition associated with frequent hospitalisation. Several different disease management interventions (clinical service organisation interventions) for patients with CHF have been proposed.
Objectives:
To assess the effectiveness of disease management interventions for patients with CHF.
Search Strategy:
We searched: Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials (to June 2003); MEDLINE (January 1966 to July 2003); EMBASE (January 1980 to July 2003); CINAHL (January 1982 to July 2003); AMED (January 1985 to July 2003); Science Citation Index Expanded (searched January 1981 to March 2001); SIGLE (January 1980 to July 2003); DARE (July 2003); National Research Register (July 2003); NHS Economic Evaluations Database (March 2001); reference lists of articles and asked experts in the field.
Selection Criteria:
Randomised controlled trials comparing disease management interventions specifically directed at patients with CHF to usual care.
Data Collection And Analysis:
At least two reviewers independently extracted data information and assessed study quality. Study authors were contacted for further information where necessary.
Main Results:
Sixteen trials involving 1,627 people were included. We classified the interventions into three models: multidisciplinary interventions (a holistic approach bridging the gap between hospital admission and discharge home delivered by a team); case management interventions (intense monitoring of patients following discharge often involving telephone follow up and home visits); and clinic interventions (follow up in a CHF clinic). There was considerable overlap within these categories, however the components, intensity and duration of the interventions varied. Case management interventions tended to be associated with reduced all cause mortality but these findings were not statistically significant (odds ratio 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.67 to 1.10, P = 0.23), although the evidence was stronger when analysis was limited to the better quality studies (odds ratio 0.68, 95% confidence interval 0.46 to 0.98, P = 0.04). There was weak evidence that case management interventions may be associated with a reduction in admissions for heart failure. It is unclear what the effective components of the case management interventions are. The single RCT of a multidisciplinary intervention showed reduced heart-failure related re-admissions in the short term. At present there is little available evidence to support clinic based interventions.
Authors' Conclusions:
The data from this review are insufficient for forming recommendations. Further research should include adequately powered, multi-centre studies. Future studies should also investigate the effect of interventions on patients' and carers' quality of life, their satisfaction with the interventions and cost effectiveness.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations
