Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip
Published on: June 4, 2020
Intraobserver error associated with measurements of the hand
Seth M Weinberg1, Nicole M Scott, Katherine Neiswanger
1Department of Anthropology, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, USA. smwst46@sdmgenetics.pitt.edu
Abstract:
Measurements of the hand are common in studies that use anthropometric data. However, despite widespread usage, relatively few studies have formally assessed the degree of measurement error associated with standard measurements of the hand. This is significant because high amounts of measurement error can invalidate statistical results. In this paper, intraobserver precision estimates for measures of total hand length and total 3rd-digit length were evaluated from repeated measures on 90 subjects (180 separate hands and fingers). From this replicate data, three precision estimates were calculated: the technical error of measurement (TEM), the relative technical error of measurement (rTEM), and the coefficient of reliability (R). For both measurements, all three estimates yielded a very high degree of precision (TEM < 2 mm, rTEM < 1%, and R > or = 0.95). These results suggest that both total hand length and 3rd-digit length are sufficiently precise for anthropometric research applications.
Related Concept Videos
Errors in Taping
Errors and Mistakes in Surveying
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors
