Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

Biosensor for Detection of Antibiotic Resistant Staphylococcus Bacteria
Published on: May 8, 2013
[Optimising patient isolation due to methicllin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus]
J A J W Kluytmans1, P J van den Broek
1Amphia Ziekenhuis, Laboratorium voor Microbiologie en Infectiepreventie, 4800 RL Breda. jkluytmans@amphia.nl
Abstract:
Isolation of patients is used to control the spread of certain microorganisms in the hospital, e.g. meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Recent investigations have shown that the quality of care for patients in isolation is affected significantly. However, this is not accompanied by an effect on the morbidity or mortality. The successful Dutch policy on MRSA is based largely on strict isolation of patients colonised with MRSA. If MRSA becomes endemic, this is accompanied by increases in morbidity and mortality as well as costs. The disadvantages of isolation are recognised and should be prevented as far as possible. New diagnostic and therapeutic developments can shorten the duration of isolation significantly, which will further improve the quality of care.
Insights
Patient isolation, such as for meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), impacts care quality but not patient outcomes. Advances can shorten isolation duration, improving care.
Area of Science:
- Infection control in healthcare settings.
- Hospital epidemiology and public health.
Context:
- Patient isolation is a key strategy for controlling hospital-acquired infections like MRSA.
- Current isolation practices significantly affect the quality of patient care.
- Despite quality impacts, isolation has not demonstrably affected patient morbidity or mortality.
Purpose:
- To evaluate the impact of patient isolation on quality of care.
- To analyze the relationship between MRSA isolation policies and patient outcomes.
- To explore the implications of MRSA endemicity in hospitals.
Summary:
- Hospital isolation, while crucial for infection control (e.g., MRSA), negatively impacts patient care quality.
- The Dutch MRSA policy relies heavily on strict isolation, which can lead to increased morbidity, mortality, and costs if MRSA becomes endemic.
- Recognizing isolation's drawbacks is essential for mitigation.
Impact:
- New diagnostic and therapeutic advancements offer potential to reduce isolation duration.
- Shortening isolation periods can significantly enhance the quality of care for patients.
- Proactive management of isolation protocols is necessary to prevent negative consequences.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Transmission-based Precautions I: Contact, Enteric, and Droplets
Contact Precautions:
Contact precautions are the measures taken to prevent the transmission of infectious agents, especially epidemiologically important microorganisms such as MRSA or influenza, primarily transmitted through direct or indirect contact with an...
Staphylococcal Skin Infections